Search for: "Constitution Party of South Dakota"
Results 321 - 340
of 378
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Nov 2011, 9:45 am
In their petition, the states put the question this way: “Does Congress exceed its enumerated powers and violate basic principles of federalism when it coerces states into accepting onerous conditions that it could not impose directly by threatening to withhold all federal funding under the single largest grant-in-aid program, or does the limitation on Congress’s spending power that this Court recognized in South Dakota v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 7:10 pm
Sebelius Docket: 11-400 Issue: (1) Whether Congress exceeds its enumerated powers and violate basic principles of federalism when it coerces states into accepting onerous conditions that it could not impose directly by threatening to withhold all federal funding under the single largest grant-in-aid program, or whether the limitation on Congress‘s spending power that this Court recognized in South Dakota v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 1:01 pm
App. 1997) (FDA regulatory status outside common law informed consent; discussion of status only required where FDA regulations say so).Since 2007, the only contrary authority that we know of was a rogue South Dakota federal court, predicting (in blatant violation of Erie principles) that South Dakota, uniquely, would allow a regulatory informed consent claim. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 2:07 pm
Within a short time, ABE also acquired two existing ethanol plants in South Dakota, which ABE renovated and expanded. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 8:27 am
Constitution, Arizona Constitution, U.S. [read post]
10 Sep 2011, 12:59 am
The court held that because this suit constituted a pre-enforcement action seeking to restrain the assessment of a tax, the Anti-Injunction Act, 28 U.S.C. 2283, stripped the court of jurisdiction. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 11:10 pm
Todd County School Dist.Docket: 10-1411Issue(s): (1) Whether, for purposes of determining whether formal process is due a student who seeks to appeal a disciplinary suspension, a disciplinary suspension of a student with a disability ends when it becomes a change of educational placement under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004 (IDEA); and (2) whether IDEA administrative procedures provide a suitable remedy for a disabled student's claim that school… [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 4:13 pm
Her research centers on the intersection of health care and constitutional law. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 3:19 pm
Constitution, Arizona Constitution, U.S. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 4:59 pm
Regarding conditional federal grants, in 1987 in South Dakota v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 8:22 am
However, in mid-June Michigan introduced a bill (HB 4769) co-sponsored by 42 of 63 Michigan House Republicans that copied much of the language from the versions introduced in Iowa, Kansas, Maine, Missouri, South Dakota, and West Virginia, in particular the use of the term “informal tribunals” or “informal administrative body” in all of these versions, something that does not appear in the others. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 7:57 am
The USBIC also contends that the bill’s approach, awarding a patent to the first person to file, as opposed to the first person to invent, “was rejected by the Constitutional Convention and by the First Congress, in which many of the Constitution’s framers sat. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 9:55 am
Constitution, Arizona Constitution, U.S. [read post]
3 May 2011, 12:36 pm
Constitution, Arizona Constitution, U.S. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm
If only some, then there’s the additional question of how much effort the legal system should expend, or force the parties to expend, in sorting one from the other.We thought we’d explore that question today, and we start by comparing arguably the most pro-plaintiff state in the country – Idaho – on comment k issues with the most pro-defense state – California. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 12:00 pm
Constitution, Arizona Constitution, U.S. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 4:39 pm
" South Dakota Governor Signs Outrageous Law Restricting Abortion Care This is a bill that requires women to jump through flaming hoops for abortion care; women must get counseling — which is, by law, invasive, anti-choice and medically frightening — and then wait 72 anxious and potentially dangerous hours before being allowed access to their constitutional right to an abortion. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 11:14 am
” As the Supreme Court of South Dakota has explained, “A judge simply cannot be both a judge and [an attorney] searching out facts favorable to [a party] without abandoning his or her judicial neutrality. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 10:30 am
Constitution, Arizona Constitution, U.S. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 7:11 am
South Dakota: The House Judiciary committee voted 13-0 to kill HJR 1004, a proposed constitutional amendment that reader “No such court [i.e. [read post]
