Search for: "Conte v. State" Results 321 - 340 of 550
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Dec 2013, 2:16 pm
The United States Constitution and the New York State Constitution provide that no person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 5:20 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Static Control counterclaimed for state and federal false advertising/antitrust claims. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 12:20 pm by Eric Goldman
However, I think it's likely the Conte Bros. test will be permanently retired in a few months.] ___ Photo credit: Used laser printer toner in a recycle bag // ShutterStockTomorrow, the United States Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in Lexmark International, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 3:00 pm
While there is a minimum level of protection below which no state can go, the fact that some states provide greater protections does not require New York to do the same. [read post]
29 Nov 2013, 9:35 am by Ronald Mann
Lexmark has the luxury of emphasizing, on almost every page, then-Judge Alito’s Third Circuit opinion in Conte Brothers Automotive, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 2:34 pm
Otherwise, an offender could avoid sex offender registration requirements simply by moving his or her state of residence, thereby frustrating the purpose behind sex offender registration laws as in People v. [read post]
16 Nov 2013, 4:31 pm by Stephen Bilkis
At the time of defendant's trial, polygraph tests had not been proven to be reliable as held in People v Leone. [read post]