Search for: "Cooper v. Smith"
Results 321 - 340
of 661
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Dec 2013, 5:25 am
Supp.2d 556 (D.N.J. 2013), along with Cooper v. [read post]
3 May 2016, 1:42 am
, 128 U.S. 315 (1888) Cooper v. [read post]
11 May 2007, 2:34 am
The Supreme Court, in its famous decision in Cooper v. [read post]
11 May 2007, 2:34 am
The Supreme Court, in its famous decision in Cooper v. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 1:57 pm
Smith. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 4:46 am
(IP Dragon) Denmark Denmark's new transfer pricing IP valuation guideline (IP finance) Europe ECJ: COLOR EDITION - the A-G delivers his opinion on the application by Lâncome: Lancôme v OHIM and CMS Hasche Sigle (Class 46) ECJ: Diesel ruling affirms that exhausting still trumps trademarks, but consent must be unequivocal: Makro Zelfbedieningsgroothandel CV, Metro Cash & Carry BV and Remo Zaandam BV v Diesel SpA (Class 46) (IPKat) CFI: KINDER vs TIMI… [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 4:46 am
(IP Dragon) Denmark Denmark's new transfer pricing IP valuation guideline (IP finance) Europe ECJ: COLOR EDITION - the A-G delivers his opinion on the application by Lâncome: Lancôme v OHIM and CMS Hasche Sigle (Class 46) ECJ: Diesel ruling affirms that exhausting still trumps trademarks, but consent must be unequivocal: Makro Zelfbedieningsgroothandel CV, Metro Cash & Carry BV and Remo Zaandam BV v Diesel SpA (Class 46) (IPKat) CFI: KINDER vs TIMI… [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 5:46 am
(IP Dragon) Denmark Denmark’s new transfer pricing IP valuation guideline (IP finance) Europe ECJ: COLOR EDITION – the A-G delivers his opinion on the application by Lâncome: Lancôme v OHIM and CMS Hasche Sigle (Class 46) ECJ: Diesel ruling affirms that exhausting still trumps trademarks, but consent must be unequivocal: Makro Zelfbedieningsgroothandel CV, Metro Cash & Carry BV and Remo Zaandam BV v Diesel SpA… [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 7:29 am
Cooper, 10-209, which also involve claims of ineffective assistance of counsel at the plea-bargaining stage. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 8:48 am
Smith, 10-1115, which had been relisted a whopping eleven times beginning on May 12, 2011. [read post]
7 May 2012, 5:00 am
Smith & Nephew, Inc., 482 F.3d 1187, 1194 (9th Cir. 2007); Phelps v. [read post]
2 Jan 2022, 4:01 pm
” Argentine Republic v. [read post]
31 Dec 2022, 4:51 pm
He instead demanded payment if thousands of pounds for his cooperation with the requests. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 5:46 pm
There was one libel jury trial (Cooper v Associated Newspapers) and a number of “judge alone trials”, notably the remarkable cases of El-Naschie and Bento. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 11:16 am
Smith, 749 S.E.2d 507 (2013). [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 12:07 pm
Smith severely restricted the number of free exercise challenges able to provoke such analysis. [read post]
19 Dec 2018, 3:26 pm
Cooper, 304 N.C. 180 (1981). [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 7:53 am
Smith, 2018 WL 718358 (A.F. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 6:00 am
The case is State v. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 12:00 am
”Citing Harlow v. [read post]
