Search for: "Cost v. State" Results 321 - 340 of 31,439
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Apr 2012, 4:36 pm by NL
(v) in the absence of a good reason to make any other order the fall back is to make no order as to costs. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 4:36 pm by NL
(v) in the absence of a good reason to make any other order the fall back is to make no order as to costs. [read post]
1 Aug 2017, 10:06 am
As such, it would breach the constitutional principle according to which all citizens stand equal before the charges levied by the state.(5) Misinterpretation of liability rulesISP/IBPs are not liable for the infringements at stake, to which the Court agreed. [read post]
11 May 2022, 11:00 am by Matthew Tokson
 The article looks at the state of Fourth Amendment law following the Supreme Court’s groundbreaking 2018 opinion in Carpenter v. [read post]
5 May 2007, 9:32 pm by Denese Dominguez
Its message, stated separately from Advisement 2 because its topic was not the same, was that, if Rush decided that she wanted a lawyer, i.e., to exercise the right to a lawyer communicated in Advisement 2, but she did not have the resources to pay for a lawyer, she would be given a lawyer at no cost and at some time. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 8:53 am
“In my view, business class tickets are much like a lawyer’s over-preparation; it may be a worthwhile expense for the client, but cannot be imposed on the opponent,” Justice Edward Morgan said in a costs endorsement in Bombardier v. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 12:33 pm by Steve Bainbridge
How the heck am I supposed to trim a 200…— Steve Bainbridge (@PrawfBainbridge) February 1, 2024 If we assume founders and managers have an incentive to minimize their cost of capital, they will prefer to incorporate in a state that ensures investor protection. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 9:55 am by Giles Peaker
However, the Order stated ‘no order as to costs’. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 9:55 am by Giles Peaker
However, the Order stated ‘no order as to costs’. [read post]