Search for: "Council v. State"
Results 321 - 340
of 10,845
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Nov 2014, 3:31 am
The Supreme Court unanimously dismissed the appeal brought by the appellant challenging the Court of Appeal’s decision to follow Hammersmith and Fulham LBC v Monk [1992] AC 478, which states that a notice to quit given by one of a number of joint periodic tenants is effective to terminate the tenancy. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 11:45 am
The letter went on to state that: “As stated at the meeting, the rationale behind the planned reduction is that we consider the current provision to be in excess of that required to meet your eligible needs under the council’s Fair Access to Care Services criteria. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 11:20 am
Bank v. [read post]
15 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Garland KJ 598 U.S. 411 18 5/11/23 21-468 National Pork Producers Council v. [read post]
15 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Garland KJ 598 U.S. 411 18 5/11/23 21-468 National Pork Producers Council v. [read post]
9 May 2012, 1:54 am
Migrationsverket v Kastrati and Others (Case C-620/10); [2012] WLR (D) 139 “The withdrawal of an asylum application which occurred before the requested member state had agreed to take charge of the asylum seeker, had the effect that Council Regulation (EC) No 343/2003 which established the criteria and mechanisms for determining the member state responsible for examining an asylum application would no longer be applicable. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 2:56 am
The Supreme Court unanimously dismissed the appeal, upholding the declarator granted in favour of the Council that any uplift due be calculated by reference to the open market value of the subjects as at the date of sale. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 7:11 am
Post-Och Telestyrelsen and Secretary of State for the Home Department v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 7:53 am
Adam Liptak wrote about my favorite exchange of the day: The question for the justices was whether that state law conflicted with the National Voter Registration Act of 1993, which allows voters to register using a federal form that asks, “Are you a citizen of the United States? [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 2:43 am
The judge at first instance ruled in favour of the Council, stating that (i) the maps didn’t meet that statutory requirements; and (ii) the extent of the non-compliance was de minimus (i.e small enough to be overlooked). [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 6:57 am
In this post, Gael comments upon the decision handed down by the UK Supreme Court last month in the matter of R (on the application of Wright) v Resilient Energy Severndale Ltd and Forest of Dean District Council [2019] UKSC 53: In R (on the application of Wright) v Resilient Energy Severndale Ltd and Forest Dean District Council, which was handed down on 20 November 2019, the Supreme Court has confirmed that the materiality of a consideration in a… [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 8:30 am
Congress did not in the Energy Policy Act (EPAct) of 2005 confer on FERC federal "backstop" authority to overrule timely state decisions denying applications to site and construct proposed interstate transmission lines, a divided (2-1) panel of a U.S. appeals court ruled February 18 in the much-anticipated case of Piedmont Environmental Council v. [read post]
31 May 2024, 9:44 am
Advance release employment law opinion: State v. [read post]
31 Jan 2021, 9:54 am
” Similarly, Obama Administration veteran Susan Rice, director of Biden’s Domestic Policy Council, has stated that “every issue is a woman’s issue. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 1:00 pm
The North Carolina Supreme Court ruling in Conner, et al v. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 2:45 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) AR, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 857 (26 July 2011) Thomas & Ors v Bridgend County Borough Council [2011] EWCA Civ 862 (26 July 2011) Rust Consulting Ltd v PB Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 899 (26 July 2011) Destiny 1 Ltd v Lloyds TSB Bank Plc [2011] EWCA Civ 831 (26 July 2011) MH (Algeria), R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the… [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 4:09 pm
Copied from Immigration Council The United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:48 pm
Worse, summer represents what the National Safety Council refers to as the "100 Most Dangerous Days" for teens, as schedules are less structured and they are more likely to pile into the car with friends. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 6:27 pm
Friends of Motherhouse v. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 6:00 am
Relations Bd., 39 NY3d 17, 22 [2022], quoting Matter of City of Watertown v State of N.Y. [read post]
