Search for: "County of Orange v. Superior Court" Results 321 - 340 of 369
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Sep 2016, 6:00 am by Nassiri Law
Contact the employment attorneys at Nassiri Law Group, practicing in Orange County, Riverside and Los Angeles. [read post]
25 Sep 2016, 6:00 am by Nassiri Law
Contact the employment attorneys at Nassiri Law Group, practicing in Orange County, Riverside and Los Angeles. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 9:58 am by Arthur F. Coon
  The statute prescribing the record’s content – Public Resources Code § 21167.6(e) – has expansive language that courts have described as “contemplat[ing] that the administrative record will include pretty much everything that ever came near a proposed development or to the agency’s compliance with CEQA in responding to that development” (County of Orange v. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 11:23 am by Neil Cahn
Bracci, the court affirmed an order of Delaware County Family Court Judge Carl F. [read post]
27 Jul 2016, 7:01 am by Nassiri Law
Contact the employment attorneys at Nassiri Law Group, practicing in Orange County, Riverside and Los Angeles. [read post]
30 May 2008, 12:26 pm
Things turned nasty and both sides moved for sanctions.In a tentative order filed Thursday (see Page 31 of this pdf) , Santa Clara County Superior Court Judge Socrates "Pete" Manoukian rejected both sides' request for sanctions. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 8:50 am by Aaron
Carona: Former Orange County, California sheriff Michael Carona appealed a guilty verdict on one count of witness tampering. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 9:24 am by Nassiri Law
Contact the employment attorneys at Nassiri Law Group, practicing in Orange County, Riverside and Los Angeles. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 2:52 pm by Christine Hurt
  Remember, in the early 1990s, derivatives were blamed on a lot of things, including the insolvency of Orange County. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 2:00 pm by Maureen Johnston
Superior Court of California, Orange County 13-956Issue: Whether the California Court of Appeal erred when it deepened an acknowledged circuit split and held—contrary to this Court's decisions in Buckman Co. v. [read post]