Search for: "Craft v. State"
Results 321 - 340
of 3,973
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 May 2017, 8:00 am
Here: In Lewis v. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 5:00 am
Miss. 1992) (holding that depositions are different from examinations under oath); Craft v. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 6:11 am
Addressing the issue for the first time, the Third Circuit concluded a state employee’s ADA and Title VII claims, standing alone, could not be asserted under Section 1983, because that would allow her to thwart Congress’s carefully crafted administrative scheme under both the ADA and Title VII, including exhaustion requirements. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 7:32 am
See United States v. [read post]
21 Jul 2007, 8:28 am
In light of the United States Supreme Court's recent decision in Rita v. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 10:00 am
The rule was carefully crafted and vetted over a year long process. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 7:37 pm
The Supreme Court will soon hear oral arguments in Sorrell v. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 1:02 pm
Supreme Court—South Dakota v. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 6:09 am
Like in this case.The case is Taylor v. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 1:36 pm
Harpe (McGirt v. [read post]
7 May 2018, 9:41 am
United States v. [read post]
19 Aug 2012, 1:52 pm
Mark Killenbeck, author of several excellent legal histories, including one on M’Culloch v. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 6:00 am
Tobacco Tax Differentials across States Cause Significant Smuggling The crafting of tax policy can never be divorced from an understanding of the law of unintended consequences, but it is too often disregarded or misunderstood in political debate, and sometimes policies, however well-intentioned, have unintended consequences that outweigh their benefits. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 5:32 pm
R. v. [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 5:01 am
Not all states impose such severe penalties, however. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 2:55 am
Tobacco Tax Differentials across States Cause Significant Smuggling The crafting of tax policy can never be divorced from an understanding of the law of unintended consequences, but it is too often disregarded or misunderstood in political debate, and sometimes policies, however well-intentioned, have unintended consequences that outweigh their benefits. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 9:01 pm
In that case, the owner of the arts and crafts store, Hobby Lobby, was able to deploy RFRA to craft healthcare plans reflecting his religious beliefs even though those beliefs solely undermined women’s healthcare plans. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 2:29 pm
Gonzalez v. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 2:04 pm
In particular, a recent case – Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 3:56 pm
Professor Michael McConnell points me to United States v. [read post]