Search for: "Cross v. Superior Court" Results 321 - 340 of 1,402
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Dec 2014, 7:15 am by John H Curley
In light of this finding, the Court did not reach the public policy question.In contrast, public policy was the primary basis for the decision of the Connecticut Superior Court in State of Connecticut v. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 2:22 pm by Christopher Bird
Each week Wise Law Blog will review recent decisions from the Ontario Court of Appeal.Abou-Elmaati v. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 4:27 pm by Georgialee Lang
Justice Joseph Quinn of the Ontario Superior Court well- deserves his international reputation as a clever intellect, a raconteur of immense talent, and a really funny scribe. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 6:46 am by Doorey
 That was the finding of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice in an important decision released yesterday. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 1:05 pm by Andrew Stine
A "writ of prohibition", in the United States, is an official legal document drafted and issued by a supreme court, superior court or an appeals court to a judge presiding over a suit in an inferior court. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 4:22 am by Peter Mahler
” Pennsylvania: Statutory Default Provisions Codifying “Pick Your Partner” Principle Defeat Claims by Assignee of 50% LLC Membership Interest If the court’s decision in DiDonato can be likened to an easy basketball layup, the Pennsylvania Superior Court’s recent decision in Larikov, LLC v Cao (read here) equates to a slam dunk. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 4:00 am by Matt Maurer
After setting out the jurisdiction to make such an order and the enumerated factors that are to be considered, the court went on to consider some recent policy considerations and in particular the 2014 Supreme Court of Canada decision of Hryniak v. [read post]
14 May 2013, 8:12 am by Sheldon Toplitt
 (Photo credit: Wikipedia)Plainridge Racecourse, d/b/a Ourway Realty, has dropped its appeal of a Norfolk County Superior Court judge's dismissal of its defamation suit against a Plainville (Mass.) opponent of slot machine gambling at the harness racing track and will pay the defendant's attorneys fees of almost $25,000 pursuant to the Massachusetts anti-SLAPP (Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation) statute [M.G.L. c. 231, sec. 59H], the Attleboro Sun Chronicle… [read post]