Search for: "D. STRICKLAND"
Results 321 - 340
of 422
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Mar 2008, 12:47 pm
Ted Strickland's office and other interested parties.The legislation, Senate Bill 10, passed through the Ohio General Assembly in June and was signed by Gov. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 1:01 pm
§ 2254(d), that a defendant retains a constitutional right to revoke his prior waiver of counsel at trial and require re-appointment of counsel to file a new-trial motion. [read post]
9 May 2009, 12:11 pm
Whiteside, 475 U.S. 157, 106 S.Ct. 988, 993 (1986), quoting Strickland v. [read post]
16 May 2008, 9:41 am
" NFP criminal opinions today (11): Joshua D. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 7:40 am
As he put it to close the day, “record silence under AEDPA and Strickland means the State wins. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 6:39 am
§ 2254(d) permits a federal court to ignore the reasoning of the state court and substitute its own reasons for denying relief and whether the violent nature of the crime lessens the prejudice from unconstitutional shackling. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 7:36 am
You remember her.She's the one who, back in 1995, was lecturing a woman who'd entered a guilty plea credit card fraud as part of an effort to find a good man. [read post]
8 Nov 2008, 8:25 pm
If John Kerry had won in 2004, we'd have a different U.S. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 12:54 pm
Maybe you wish we'd kill more. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 9:32 am
(in support of the petitioner) Amicus brief of Professor Richard D. [read post]
23 May 2014, 11:44 am
§ 2254(d)(2) merely because the state court does not conduct an evidentiary hearing. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 11:24 am
Maryland, and that this failure prejudiced the defense; and (2) whether the Louisiana courts erred in failing to find that the petitioner’s attorney provided ineffective representation at the guilt phase of trial under Strickland v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 2:09 pm
Courtesy of Law Offices of Dena Alo-Colbeck “Writing and Research for Washington Attorneys” The following criminal cases of note were decided this week: Washington State Law Washington State Supreme Court: State v. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 7:57 am
Carolyn Maloney (D-NY) asks Mr. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 9:37 am
§ 2254(d)(2) merely because the state court does not conduct an evidentiary hearing. [read post]
26 May 2022, 8:45 am
Texas, which were amply supported by the habeas and trial records, and whether the Texas court disregarded the Supreme Court’s express guidance for conducting a prejudice analysis pursuant to Strickland v. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 8:36 am
Why haven’t these cases been GVR’d yet? [read post]
21 May 2012, 2:15 pm
General Revenue Corp.Docket: 11-1175Issue(s): (1) Whether a prevailing defendant in a Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) case may be awarded costs for a lawsuit that was not “brought in bad faith and for the purpose of harassment,” when the FDCPA provides that “[o]n a finding by the court that an action under this section was brought in bad faith and for the purpose of harassment, the court may award to the defendant attorney’s fees reasonable in relation to the work… [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 1:08 pm
It asks whether an appellate court violates Strickland v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 9:10 pm
As Shari Allison notes over at the Federal Defender’s Tenth Circuit blog noting that on the way to holding that the state “courts and the district court failed to properly apply Beck [that] [d]epraved-mind second-degree murder was and now is a lesser-included offense of first-degree murder under Oklahoma law (the Tenth spends some time on the meanderings of the OK courts on this issue). [read post]
