Search for: "DEAL v. DEAL"
Results 321 - 340
of 38,970
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jun 2016, 1:08 pm
The Court’s order sending the case of SmithKline Beecham Corp. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 1:52 am
This post does not deal with the ICJ’s judgment in Germany v. [read post]
8 May 2023, 8:43 pm
This has not surprisingly generated a great deal of interest and amicus briefing. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 7:40 am
Co. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 3:54 pm
The deal was the third energy transaction the firm handled in recent days. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 5:13 am
McNea v. [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 9:32 am
See Pennsylvania Avenue Funds v. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 11:40 am
The reversal of the injunction came just two days after the court heard a speedy interlocutory appeal in the case (C&J Energy Services, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 10:11 pm
Citigroup has consented to pay $285 million to settle a Securities and Exchange Commission complaint accusing the bank of misleading investors in a $1 billion derivatives deal—a collateralized debt obligation called Class V Funding III. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 4:24 pm
China Business Law Blog has an interesting post on the Danone v. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 10:43 pm
Costs webinar from Kings Chambers’ Matthew Smith and Paul Hughes discussing how the judgment of the Court of Appeal in Kenig v Thomson Snell and Passmore LLP [2024] EWCA Civ 15 affects the way that solicitors ought to perform retainers dealing with the administration of estates and the likelihood and course of assessment of their […] The post Costs webinar on Kenig v Thomson Snell and Passmore LLP first appeared on Legal Costs Specialists - Gibbs Wyatt Stone. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 3:11 pm
I shall provide two important hints.Hint #1: The source is one of the following:- Access Copyright (“AC”)- Association of Universities and Colleges Canada (“AUCC”)- Canadian Association of Research Libraries ("CARL")- Council of Ministers of Education Canada ("CMEC")Hint #2:The landmark Supreme Court of Canada decision dealing with fair dealing, namely CCH. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 6:41 pm
Pierson v. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 3:34 am
Tann v Herrington [2009] EWHC 445 (Ch); [2009] WLR (D) 89 “Where a partner entrusted with the responsibility of dealing with all aspects of the firm's professional indemnity insurance failed to fulfil his obligations, a liability in damages to a client, for which the firm's professional indemnity insurer had refused indemnity, was a liability to be [...] [read post]
21 Jul 2021, 1:43 pm
In Russell v. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 8:32 am
The post Is Ownership of Guns Itself Evidence of Drug Dealing? [read post]
17 Jul 2021, 9:47 pm
In Firefighters’ Pension System of the City of Kansas City, Missouri Trust v. [read post]
21 Aug 2010, 7:21 am
The Volokh Conspiracy: “Several readers asked me why United States v. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 8:49 am
The issues at hand in this case deal with procedural issues when dealing with infringement lawsuits at the federal level, while there is a pending appeal with the USPTO. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 7:23 am
Phelan of the Federal Court in file T-578-13:IN THE MATTER OF THE CANADIAN COPYRIGHT LICENSING AGENCY ("ACCESS COPYRIGHT") v. [read post]
