Search for: "DISTRIBUTED SOLUTIONS V. UNITED STATES "
Results 321 - 340
of 566
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 May 2015, 7:04 pm
United States, No. 13-7451, Slip op. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 8:52 am
It does come down to protection v. exercise. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 8:00 am
The issue of law enforcement access to data held abroad is in the news again with the Supreme Court set to hear oral argument in United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 9:55 pm
That also means that it will be as important for states to provide a means of training people to read and assess these reports as it is for states to develop the ability to produce them. 6. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
Volkswagon-based transfer mandamus order in In re TS Tech USA (Inventive Step) (Hal Wegner) (EDTexweblog.com) (EDTexweblog.com) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Patently-O) (Law360) (Patent Prospector) ECJ decides Obelix too famous to be confused with MOBILIX mobile phone service: Les Éditions Albert René Sàrl v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market, Orange A/S (Class 46) (IPKat) Global Global – General Moral… [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 5:14 am
Hewlett-Packard Co. v Acceleron LLC (Inventive Step) (IP Spotlight) District Court S D California.: Evidence relating to re-examination proceedings excluded from trial: Presidio Components Inc., v. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 12:02 pm
” 750 ILCS 5/503(b)(3)(emphasis mine) There is literally zero case law in the United States about how to specifically divide a carried interest in a divorce action. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 3:15 am
Analysis Football DataCo v Yahoo! [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 12:58 am
The general message from the most recent reports is that while some areas have improved, the overall quality of health care in the United States is suboptimal. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 7:44 am
As a result, indirect purchaser class actions in the United States often are not certified for class treatment under Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“Rule 23”) or comparable class action rules in state courts. [read post]
7 Oct 2016, 2:40 pm
He noted that though the business community (along with NGOs and local governments) were excluded from the Paris negotiation these GHG programs might prove a good means creating robust governance beyond the state but in conjunction with states. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 11:20 am
* She also argued, based on United States v. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 7:00 pm
– Facebook’s contractual rights to users’ photos problematic: (Spicy IP)PharmaEuropean Commission probes pharmaceutical sector: (Philip Brooks),WHO Board sets course on IP, avian flu, tighter publication policy: (Intellectual Property Watch),India: The Competition Act, patents and over hyped drugs: (Part I - Spicy IP), (Part II – Spicy IP), (Part III – Spicy IP),Ignoring not the solution … [read post]
1 May 2024, 5:00 am
Supreme Court ruled in Fourth Estate v. [read post]
5 Aug 2023, 5:04 am
United KingdomMeechan v. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 6:50 am
(Laurence Kaye on Digital Media Law) United States US General David Kappos confirmed as USPTO Director (IP Watchdog) (Patently-O) (Anticipate This!) [read post]
1 May 2012, 12:58 pm
JERICHO STATE CAPITAL CORP. [read post]
6 Mar 2016, 2:51 pm
By the same token, the ability to publish without prior permission from intermediaries facilitates distribution of counter-terrorist information and messages. 2) Pseudonymity and non-traceability enable communications by terrorists that are difficult to link to their source, and enable interested recipients to engage or view material without revealing their identity as an adherent. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 9:30 pm
She proposed preventative measures: municipalities should distribute locks in informal settlements, so that women could protect themselves and their children. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 12:15 pm
What is new is the careful drafting Lasater brings to the proposed solution. [read post]
