Search for: "DOE v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al" Results 321 - 340 of 344
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Mar 2008, 5:57 pm
Sensient Technologies Corporation et al v. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 9:11 am
BEHDAD, INC. et al District of Columbia District Court Filed: March 4, 2008 Plaintiff: LIFTED RESEARCH GROUP, INC. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 7:04 am
(The case is District of Columbia v. [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 9:00 am
: (Spicy IP),USD 20 billion going off-patent: (Patent Circle),Canadian Prices Review Board asserts jurisdiction over products sold in US, but imported into Canada under Special Access Program: (Gowlings),Canadian Court of Appeal affirms decision allowing patent-owner to be joined to proceedings: Cobalt v Pfizer and Pharmascience v Pfizer: (Gowlings),PharmaStem appeals stem cell patent: asks for greater deference to patent examiners:… [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 11:32 am
(The Court took no action on Tuesday on a conditional cross-petition, Parker, et al., v. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 10:02 am
(The Court took no action on Tuesday on a conditional cross-petition, Parker, et al., v. [read post]
13 Nov 2007, 7:02 am
The appeal in 07-290 (District of Columbia v. [read post]
10 Sep 2007, 7:25 am
The hearing in Rasul, et al., v. [read post]
10 Sep 2007, 7:25 am
The hearing in Rasul, et al., v. [read post]
29 Aug 2007, 10:22 am
(32-CA-19152-1, et al.; 350 NLRB No. 62) Lindsay, CA Aug. 16, 2007. [read post]
9 Aug 2007, 5:53 am
Radley, et al., Off-Label Prescribing Among Office-Based Physicians, 166 Arch. [read post]
18 Jul 2007, 8:25 pm
., for a 30-day extension of the time to file the city's petition in the case of District of Columbia, et al., v. [read post]
18 Jul 2007, 8:25 pm
Roberts, Jr., for a 30-day extension of the time to file the city's petition in the case of District of Columbia, et al., v. [read post]
4 Jun 2007, 10:39 am
Pakootas, et al. (06-1188). [read post]
25 May 2007, 3:28 pm
Quranic Literacy Institute, et al. [read post]