Search for: "DOES 1 THROUGH 15" Results 321 - 340 of 13,630
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Mar 2024, 4:39 am by jonathanturley
Weiss’s filing bulldozes through arguments of selective prosecution and political influence in the case. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 9:03 pm by Joe Whitworth
A negative test does not prove that raw ingredients or a specific food is not contaminated,” said UKHSA. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 6:02 pm
What her family had gone through should never have happened. [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
We further find that the evidence in the record does not support the imposition of the firearm restriction under R.C. 2903.214(E)(1). [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm
§§11–113(1), 1–4–1101(1), 1–4–1201, 1–4–1203(2)(a), 1–4–1204 (2023).After a five-day trial, the state District Court found thatformer President Trump had “engaged in insurrection”within the meaning of Section 3, but nonetheless denied therespondents’ petition. [read post]
2 Mar 2024, 6:08 am
The intention is to provide an overview of the entirety of the textual project that is the UNGP before a deeper examination of its parts, the vectors through which intention has been inserted or projected, and the manifestation of interpretation and intent in the application of the UNGP by actors seeking to influence or solidify text as act, that is, of the conscious human experience of the UNGP.[15]       2.1 U.N. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 11:34 am by Norman L. Eisen
If the stay is lifted on May 13, the equivalent date for these proposals would be June 15. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 11:10 am by Katelynn Minott, CPA & CEO
Incurs taxes of either 0%, 15%, or 20%, depending on income tax bracket. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 6:10 am by Federica Paddeu
In light of these disagreements, it is worth taking a step back, and exploring the scope of these requirements in some more depth. 1. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 3:23 pm by Richard Hunt
Five Guys Enterprises, LLC, No. 15-CV-2845 (JPO), 2016 WL 482981, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 2:06 pm by Guest Author
  When the case reached the Supreme Court, NRDC made the “textualist” argument (what would later be called a Step 1 argument) that the statute was unambiguous and did not permit bubbling. [read post]