Search for: "DOES 1-121"
Results 321 - 340
of 1,229
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Sep 2019, 4:33 am
Pac., LLC v Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker, LLP, 38 AD3d 34, 38 [2006]; see EBC I, Inc. v Goldman, Sachs & Co., 5 NY3d 11, 19 [2005]; Tooma v Grossbarth, 121 AD3d 1093, 1095 [2014]). [read post]
23 Aug 2019, 5:14 pm
In other words, if someone establishes his or her residence or domicile in Italy sometime on or before June 30 of a given year, his or her tax residence would begin on the first day (January 1) of that year, and if someone moves his or her residence or domicile outside of Italy sometimes on or after July 1 of a given year, his or her last day of residence would be the last day (December 31) of that year year. [read post]
19 Aug 2019, 9:00 am
§ 121(1). [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 10:59 am
This yielded an imprisonment range up to 121 months or 10 years and 1 month. [read post]
4 Aug 2019, 1:26 pm
” Rose does not require a formal medical record to recall how things went for her daughter over the next several days. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 4:00 am
For this last week: 1. [read post]
28 Jul 2019, 8:51 pm
Simply put, the record does not disclose the necessary balancing of rights and freedoms in relation to the statutory objectives. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 3:11 am
" In re Kohr Bros., Inc., 121 U.S.P.Q.2d 1793, 1795 (T.T.A.B. 2017) (quoting In re Osterberg, 83 U.S.P.Q.2d 1220, 1223 (T.T.A.B. 2007). [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 11:44 pm
If G 1/18 is applicable, but the case is not stayed as the outcome on the merits of the appeal does not change, can a decision on the reimbursement/refund be made without staying in view of the relevance of G 1/18 on that decision (esp. as refund is not at the discretion of the EPO/Board)? [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 2:29 am
On appeal from: [2017] NIQB 121 This appeal considered whether, on a true construction of condition 4 in the Justice and Security (Northern Ireland) Act 2007, s 1, it embraces members of the security forces in Northern Ireland accused of offences that are not part of sectarian violence, and whether the ordinary rules of natural justice apply to the issuance of a certificate under s 1. [read post]
27 May 2019, 1:37 am
The establishment of an opposition procedure before the French PTO (hereinafter “INPI”) (Article 121, former Article 42) Article 121 proposes to introduce an opposition procedure before the INPI against French patents. [read post]
21 May 2019, 2:07 pm
The Divisional Court dismissed their claims, holding that while the applicants’ freedom of religion was contravened by the policies, the policies were justified under section 1 of the Charter, and that their freedom of religion under section 15(1) had not been contravened. [read post]
14 May 2019, 8:01 am
Moreover, as it seems to me, the phrase does connote the allowance of a period of time to enable the reasonable man to evaluate those facts so as to convert the facts into a reasonable belief. [read post]
10 May 2019, 9:30 pm
During 2013–2015, 226 specimens underwent additional testing, of which 197 (87%) had detectable HAV RNA; of the RNA-positive specimens, 76 (39%), 121 (61%), and 0 (0%) tested positive for a genotype IA, IB, or IIIA viral strain, respectively. [read post]
10 May 2019, 1:07 pm
Analysis Liberally construing Carter's brief, we interpret Carter to assert the following points: (1) The agreement does not require an arbitration order to issue before an arbitration may be initiated under the arbitration clause [read post]
10 May 2019, 12:59 pm
In the final judgment the trial court reiterated the same seven declarations:1. [read post]
The U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology Green Paper on Improving Technology Transfer
29 Apr 2019, 2:12 pm
For example, on the government manufacturing clause: NIST Finding 1. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 9:53 am
Canchola, 121 S.W.3d 735, 739 (Tex. 2003)). [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 4:00 am
Supreme Court, in effect, denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding and Plaintiff appealed the Supreme Court's ruling.The Appellate Division disagreed with Plaintiff's contention that Civil Rights Law §50-a(1) does not apply to the records demanded held by the custodian, explaining:1. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 4:00 am
Supreme Court, in effect, denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding and Plaintiff appealed the Supreme Court's ruling.The Appellate Division disagreed with Plaintiff's contention that Civil Rights Law §50-a(1) does not apply to the records demanded held by the custodian, explaining:1. [read post]
