Search for: "DOYLE v. STATE" Results 321 - 340 of 521
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Feb 2018, 12:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The seminal case in New York State regarding standards of fairness is the Pell decision [Pell v Board of Education, 34 NY2d 222]. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 5:56 am by Edith Roberts
At the Notice and Comment blog, David Feder discusses Esquivel-Quintana v. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 1:49 pm by Lyle Denniston
United States, involves Doyle Randall Paroline of Tyler, Texas. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 1:05 am by Peter Mahler
The above quotation’s last sentence and citation to Doyle v Icon foretold the outcome. [read post]
29 Jan 2007, 11:57 am
He lived in Hawaii before coming home to Washington State when his health began to fail. [read post]
8 Oct 2018, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
  Jay J found that the broadcast complained of bore a Chase Level 3 meaning. 15 October 2018, Doyle v Smith, listed for 5 days. [read post]
19 Dec 2006, 6:58 am
SchoenhoferConsumption of alcohol by a minorIssue #1: Denial of motion to suppress (improper detention)State v. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 11:51 am
Doyle v Siddo, 54 AD3d 988, 989 [2d Dept 2008]; Iafalo v Nationwide Mut. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 4:54 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
Tradesman Program Managers LLC v Doyle, 2020 NY Slip Op 32452[U] [Sup Ct, Kings County 2020]; Barrison v D’Amato & Lynch, LLP, 2019 NY Slip Op 30905[U] [Sup Ct, NY County]; Lentini v 219 W. 20th St. [read post]
26 May 2009, 1:53 am
Reversed a district court holding that would have allowed Ohio State football player Maurice Clarett to enter the NFL draft early.Williams v. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 3:20 am by Peter Mahler
The hard lesson learned by the petitioner in Matter of Norvell v Guchi’s Idea LLC, 2016 NY Slip Op 32307(U) [Sup Ct Kings County Nov. 18, 2016], has been taught before, starting most prominently with the First Department’s 2013 decision in Doyle v Icon, LLC and reinforced by that court two years later in Barone v Sowers, holding that minority member claims of oppressive majority conduct including systematic exclusion from the LLC’s… [read post]