Search for: "Daily v. Superior Court"
Results 321 - 340
of 872
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Sep 2014, 12:53 pm
On July 21, 2014, in Felczer v. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 6:04 am
The Daily Weekly has a further report on Judge Pohl’s non-capital referral recommendation in United States v. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 2:45 pm
So, the principles of comity underline what we don on a daily basis and are extremely important. [read post]
17 Mar 2012, 7:34 am
The case can be indicted and tried in the Superior Court where the maximum penalty is up to 5 years in state prison. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 2:59 pm
Superior Court of San Mateo County, 21 Cal. 3d 144 (1978), in which the court extended the legal liability of businesses acting as social hosts to also apply to individuals hosting parties or other gatherings. [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 3:39 pm
Remittitur The Supreme Court of Arizona rendered an opinion in Soto v, Sacco on July 13, 2017. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 10:45 pm
This is illustrated by the outcome of the US Supreme Court case United States v Stevens which overturned a ban on animal snuff videos as being an unconstitutional restriction on content. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 3:18 pm
Contrary to the Daily Kos, the court did not take the property away from Bevilacqua. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 9:04 am
Superior Court, 27 Cal. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 3:58 am
Recently, the New Hampshire Supreme Court emphatically reminded employers of the risks of engaging in unethical behavior when hiring employees to obtain a competitor’s secrets In Halifax-American Energy Company, LLC v. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 3:58 am
Recently, the New Hampshire Supreme Court emphatically reminded employers of the risks of engaging in unethical behavior when hiring employees to obtain a competitor’s secrets In Halifax-American Energy Company, LLC v. [read post]
14 May 2019, 4:00 am
" Further, said the Appellate Division, in Daily Gazette Co. v City of Schenectady, 93 NY2d 145, the Court of Appeals held that, in the context of a FOIL disclosure of an officer's personnel records, preventing such disclosure requires more than merely demonstrating that the document "may be used" to evaluate performance.PBA had argued that the body-worn-camera was designed, in part, for performance evaluation purposes and is "clearly 'of… [read post]
14 May 2019, 4:00 am
" Further, said the Appellate Division, in Daily Gazette Co. v City of Schenectady, 93 NY2d 145, the Court of Appeals held that, in the context of a FOIL disclosure of an officer's personnel records, preventing such disclosure requires more than merely demonstrating that the document "may be used" to evaluate performance.PBA had argued that the body-worn-camera was designed, in part, for performance evaluation purposes and is "clearly 'of… [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 4:57 am
Shahar v. [read post]
10 Jun 2018, 4:26 pm
Canada On 6 June 2018 the Supreme Court handed down judgment in the case of Haartz v Goldhar 2018 SCC 28. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 5:22 pm
Placerville Historic Preservation League v. [read post]
3 Sep 2009, 9:48 pm
Superior Court [.pdf] . . . [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 7:37 am
Ash v. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm
The Facts in Vance v. [read post]
19 Aug 2016, 11:36 am
” The court cited cases holding the following: Court concluding that five minutes daily spent passing through security clearance on way to lunch break was de minimis (Busk v. [read post]
