Search for: "Daniel v. Social Security"
Results 321 - 340
of 533
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Oct 2015, 11:10 pm
Local authorities are coining it in, in a short-sighted race for cash by ‘regenerating’ social housing. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 9:36 am
(Thanks to Sina Safvati, Daniel Simkin, and Sabine Tsuruda, the Scott & Cyan Banister First Amendment Clinic students who worked on the brief.) [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 6:00 am
– Mary Jo White, Chair, SEC [More…] Social Media Week Part I – Using Social Media In Your Compliance Program Social Media Week Part II – Sharing in the Compliance Function Social Media Week Part III – Twitter and Innovation in Your Compliance Program Social Media Week Part IV – Telling a Story About Honey Social Media Week Part V – Tools and Apps for the… [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 7:57 pm
v=k745w6GNAfs International Principles on the Application of Human Rights to [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 2:20 pm
Daniels, 784 F.3d 1123 (7th Cir. [read post]
14 Jun 2015, 4:30 am
Court of Appeal in 'Equustek Solutions Inc. v. [read post]
22 May 2015, 1:00 pm
Co., L.P.A. v. [read post]
14 May 2015, 12:57 am
Aside from the difficulties that Google and other internet intermediaries are having in determining what is inaccurate, out of date and irrelevant, the reported English cases since Costeja, most notably Daniel Hegglin v Google Inc ([2014] EWHC 2808 (QB)) and Max Mosley v Google Inc and Google Limited ([2015 ] EWHC 59 (QB)) have highlighted a very significant tension between data protection law and the law of defamation and other content laws (including Article 8… [read post]
11 May 2015, 2:18 pm
“Privacy” issues generally concerned security in private correspondence through the mails, privacy in one’s home, effects, and telephone calls, rights of the press to publish gossip (and photographs) about named individuals, and access to records a government held about a named individual.[6] Whether data was “personal” – linked to a named individual – was rarely at issue in the case of addressed correspondence, private homes,… [read post]
11 May 2015, 6:54 am
Besser v. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 4:00 am
Thomas (Minnesota) Legal Studies Research Paper No. 15-11, 2015).Pamela Foohey, Secured Credit in Religious Institutions' Reorganizations, (2015 U Ill L Rev Slip Opinions 1).Daniel Ortner, The Terrorist's Veto: Why the First Amendment Must Protect Provocative Portrayals of the Prophet Muhammad, (April 8, 2015).J. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 2:19 pm
Suffolk County Dept. of Social Servs., 199 AD2d 393, 394; see Domestic Relations Law § 240 [1-b][b][5][iv][D]). [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 5:30 pm
UPS – Hartford attorney Daniel Schwartz of Shipman & Goodwin in his Connecticut Employment Law Blog Employee Apps = Employer Data Risk? [read post]
“Copyright law serves public ends by providing individuals with an incentive to pursue private ones”
16 Mar 2015, 5:13 am
In US v. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 1:12 pm
Referring to counter-terrorism cases and relevant public protocols in the UK, his presentation demonstrated the complexity of state secrets, the supervision of security intelligence agencies, and the tension between human rights and national security. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 5:38 am
Christopher Boehning & Daniel J. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 2:30 am
Fundamental Reform (8:30 - 10:15) (Maryland Suite B, Lobby Level): Norman Stein (Drexel), Nancy Altman (Social Security Works), Daniel Halperin (Harvard), Regina Jefferson (Catholic) Differential Affordability: Understanding the Net Cost of Law School (10:30 - 12:15)... [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 5:25 pm
In the case of K.U. v. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 9:17 am
Perrelli, Daniel P. [read post]
30 Oct 2014, 8:36 am
Beyond the Border perimeter security agreement. [read post]
