Search for: "David Faires v. State" Results 321 - 340 of 2,442
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jul 2008, 6:20 pm
  A bit:The United States Supreme Court heard oral arguments yesterday in the case of Wright v. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 12:55 pm by Michael Grossman
While the warrant did provide for inspection of areas “not limited to the anal cavity,” that should not be interpreted to mean that everything is fair game. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 6:32 am by MBettman
” Justice Stewart, to counsel for the City and Scott On June 12, 2019, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in David Ayers v. [read post]
1 Jun 2022, 9:00 pm by Vikram David Amar
To be fair, at the cert. stage parties have only so many pages to devote to the merits, as distinguished from the cert-worthiness, of the dispute, but even by these standards the Reply brief is unimpressive.Never mind that the Reply brief never engages the historical understanding (that Akhil and I go through in detail) that state “legislatures” at the Founding were understood and defined to be entities limited by state constitutions and subject to judicial… [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 6:52 am
 They write: Many conservatives have criticized Nebraska and Oklahoma for being “fair-weather federalists” because their claims hinge, in part, on Gonzales v. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 12:45 am by CMS
In this post, Kenny Henderson, David Bridge, Jessica Foley and Devina Shah, who all work within the litigation and arbitration team at CMS, comment on the decision handed down last week by the UK Supreme Court in the matter Mastercard Incorporated and others v Walter Hugh Merricks CBE [2020] UKSC 51, which has significant implications for the UK competition law collective proceedings (or class actions) regime. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 3:50 am by Catherine Rose
  Catherine is a paralegal at David Phillips & Partners, working in criminal defence. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 3:26 am by CMS
“Pay now, argue later” is ultimately the decision of the Supreme Court in Sara & Hossein Asset Holdings Ltd v Blacks Outdoor Retail Ltd. [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 5:07 pm by Benjamin Wittes
The panel hearing the case includes Chief Judge David Sentelle and Judges David Tatel and Janice Rogers Brown. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 11:17 am by Dennis Crouch
Matal is expressed in Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty, Ltd. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 3:54 am by Amy Howe
It has been a week since the Court announced that it would review United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2023, 7:25 pm by Jim Lindgren
Second, Alexander Hamilton himself said in his brief for the United States in Hylton v. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 6:21 am by Marissa Miller
Baby Girl, United States v. [read post]