Search for: "David V. Carter" Results 321 - 340 of 406
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2010, 11:34 pm by INFORRM
On January 21, in its first decision of this term, Citizens United v. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 4:11 am by Walter Olson
Automakers fight Bruce Braley/trial lawyer effort on Capitol Hill to overturn NHTSA preemption [Dow Jones, WSJ Law Blog, David Freddoso/Examiner, Carter Wood and more at PoL] Twombly/Iqbal can curb sue-’em-all, sort-’em-out-later charges of civil conspiracy [Sachse/Drug & Device Law, earlier] Claim: Obama, Kagan, Sotomayor typify “postradical” law school generation [David Fontana, Chronicle of Higher Ed via Wasserman/Prawfs (counter:… [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 12:30 pm by John Buford
  Further complicating matters, shortly after filing the Business Court lawsuit, Plaintiffs filed a separate lawsuit in the Western District of North Carolina, Carter v. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 4:30 am by sally
Regina v Carter (David) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division “If a member of the jury had to be discharged, at whatever stage in the trial, the judge was not required to direct the remaining members of the jury to ignore any views expressed by the juror who had departed. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 2:55 am by traceydennis
R v Carter (David) [2010] WLR (D) 29 “Where a member of the jury had to be discharged, at whatever stage of the trial, there was no requirement that the remaining members of the jury be directed to ignore the views expressed on any subject by the departed juror. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 8:51 pm by cdw
Dale Carter Shackelford. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 11:32 am
Bruce Braley] Related: Carter Wood at Point of Law, Washington Times, David Frum, Fort Worth Star-Telegram (on provision in health bill discouraging states from adopting limits on lawyers' fees or awards). [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 9:12 pm
More: Carter Wood/ShopFloor, Jon Fleischman/Flash Report. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 5:53 am
  Four authors propose reforms to the process: David Stras suggests that nominees be required to analyze five previous Court decisions, Stephen Carter wants to focus on nominees’ professional qualifications rather than disqualifications, Seth Rosenthal proposes a courtroom setup in which litigators ask questions, and Richard Davis is ready to dispense with hearings altogether for elections. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 5:38 pm by BH
v=ttv5dyvtF4oNow I've heard there was a secret chordThat David played, and it pleased the LordBut you don't really care for music, do you? [read post]
3 Sep 2009, 9:07 pm
Today was the deadline for all amici supporting Harris Associates to file their briefs in the Supreme Court case of Jones v. [read post]