Search for: "Davis v. Bear" Results 321 - 340 of 622
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Aug 2017, 11:56 am by Chris Winkelman and Philip Gordon
The Supreme Court has wrestled with the concept of how much partisanship is too much since first finding partisan-gerrymandering claims justiciable in Davis v. [read post]
23 Sep 2008, 1:48 pm
All but three of the convicted rapists condemned to die were black, including Odom and James Davis, who was 16 and the youngest inmate executed by the state, according to a database on the Florida Department of Corrections' Web site.Florida held no executions from 1964 to 1979.Odom reportedly confessed to the rape, which occurred at knifepoint in a home in an orange grove on April 1, 1958. [read post]
9 Nov 2006, 5:17 pm
The elaboration that "the intent of a questioner is relevant only if it could affect a reasonable declarant's expectations" is, I think, the best way of making sense of a rather confusing aspect of the opinion in Davis v. [read post]
31 Aug 2007, 11:08 am
Kenneth Davis and Jennifer Davis (NFP), a 13-page 2-1 opinion, Judge Najam concludes:Here, the court did not hold an evidentiary hearing on the attorney's fee issue, and there is no indication that it considered the parties' resources, economic condition, or other factors that would bear on the reasonableness of the award of attorney's fees. [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 8:18 pm by Kevin LaCroix
In the case of Chubb, Justices Foster, Robertson and Davies took a narrow view of the meaning of the professional services exclusion[2] and gave the insurance contract a businesslike interpretation. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
Davis LJ endorsed the view of Judge Moloney QC in Theedom v Nourish Training Ltd that the presentation of evidence as to serious harm would be of little assistance and would potentially duplicate arguments as to quantum, which would be best left to trial. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
Davis LJ endorsed the view of Judge Moloney QC in Theedom v Nourish Training Ltd that the presentation of evidence as to serious harm would be of little assistance and would potentially duplicate arguments as to quantum, which would be best left to trial. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
Davis LJ endorsed the view of Judge Moloney QC in Theedom v Nourish Training Ltd that the presentation of evidence as to serious harm would be of little assistance and would potentially duplicate arguments as to quantum, which would be best left to trial. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 4:07 pm by Adrian Lurssen
Here's a look at handful of hot-topic items we've seen on JD Supra in this last week of June:- SCOTUS Overturns California's "Violent Video Games" LawFrom Davis Wright Tremaine: "The Supreme Court's June 27, 2011, decision in Brown v. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
`The proponent of transferring the motion to the issuing court bears the burden of showing “exceptional circumstances. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 2:55 pm by Bexis
  Later, after plaintiff’s device had failed and another device had to be implanted, the defendant allegedly “recalled a component of the [device] bearing the same catalogue number as the one that had been implanted in” plaintiff. [read post]