Search for: "Davis v. Strong" Results 321 - 340 of 665
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Apr 2008, 1:14 pm
The reason for the pervasive skepticism during the hour-long argument in Davis v. [read post]
16 Feb 2017, 6:28 am by Joy Waltemath
” There, she noted, the Board “restated its joint employer standard and reaffirmed its commitment to the standard articulated by the Third Circuit in NLRB v. [read post]
8 May 2008, 12:22 pm
Parke, Davis & Co., 657 F.2d 642 (4th Cir. 1981). [read post]
24 May 2010, 6:36 am by David Bernstein
If the weighted public sentiment (including the strong preferences of the minority group itself, the strong preferences of non-minority egalitarians, and the strong preferences of majority ethnic supremacists) is tolerant of minority groups, public policy will reflect that tolerance. [read post]
27 May 2010, 7:11 am by Anna Christensen
  In a piece at Time, Adam Cohen offers detailed background on Skinner v. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 2:31 am by INFORRM
IPSO 20964-23 The Irish Football Association v Sunday Life, 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 22008-23 Hibbert v Express & Star (East), 1 Accuracy (2021), 3 Harassment (2021), No breach – after investigation 22867-23 Hibbert v Express & Star (West), 1 Accuracy (2021), 3 Harassment (2021), No breach – after investigation 0825-23 Revell v The Mail on Sunday, 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 21074-23… [read post]
2 Jul 2007, 9:16 am
Davis, does not include disparate impact as anything more than evidence of the unlawful discriminatory purpose that the 14th Amendment outlaws. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 7:32 am by velvel
Davis, Administrative Law Text s 12.04, p. 250 (1972), and cases cited [read post]
7 Sep 2008, 6:23 am
  Rarely is it complimentary.From Eugene Volokh comes the decision in Live Nation Motor Sports, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 7:49 pm
Patton, 279 S.W.2d 848, 852 (Tex. 1955) (noting the majority shareholder’s suggestion that “he would not buy the stock of [the minority] for even a small fraction of its value”); Davis v. [read post]