Search for: "Day v. Genuine Parts Company"
Results 321 - 340
of 549
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jan 2012, 12:09 pm
In Beye v. [read post]
30 May 2018, 6:53 am
However, pretext was not part of a “motivating factor” analysis, so the employee did not need to discredit the company’s reasons, but only show a genuine issue of fact concerning whether race or national origin was a motivating factor in the termination decision. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 2:30 am
On Tuesday 31 January 2012, Tugendhat J heard the adjournedCMC in Kim & anr v Tong & ors (part heard from 7 October 2011) and gave ex tempore rulings. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 4:00 am
Bucaria in Rosenfeld v. [read post]
4 Dec 2015, 7:00 am
” Days later, his much younger replacement was hired and he was demoted. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 10:53 am
Bassett v. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 9:53 am
By itself, off-label promotion is no more causal than, as we commented the other day, a “video of a company employee kicking his dog. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 10:48 am
At stake is genuine academic freedom and civil discourse. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 10:04 am
Doctor’s Associates, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Jul 2013, 8:57 am
Medrick v. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 11:31 am
See Ramey v. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 7:34 am
Later, it shifted to an explanation of poor performance and bad behavior on the part of the employee as reasons for her termination. [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 2:55 pm
We modify in part and affirm as modified. [read post]
26 Sep 2015, 11:35 am
None of us foresaw Article 50 of TRIPS and the defendant’s right to have an interim injunction revoked if the plaintiff IP owner didn’t pursue the full trial within a reasonable period, 20 working days or 31 calendar days. [read post]
1 May 2012, 12:58 pm
The corporation's failure to give 60-days notice before issuing the dividend did not make it impossible for plaintiffs to comply with the trustee demand exception.Akanthos Capital Management, LLC v. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 5:11 am
Virginia Jahrke v. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 4:19 am
Consider Rhone-Poulenc Rorer Inc. v. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 6:23 pm
State is the 4-1 Supreme Court opinion on corporal punishment of children - see list of ILB entries.] * * * Considering the propriety of the force used by Matthew, the record reveals that the children had been fighting all day and that throughout the day, Matthew had warned J.M. to stop hitting her brother and sister. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 4:43 pm
In other words, speakers cannot be held liable for genuinely-held beliefs. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 11:58 am
The day of reckoning was still in the future. [read post]
