Search for: "Deal v. International Paper Co." Results 321 - 340 of 497
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Apr 2013, 8:40 am
Reciting Seager v Copydex and Banks v EMI Songs, the former judge stated that 'where an inventor wanted to sell his idea for money, money is what he got'. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 8:46 am by John Elwood
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, serves as co-counsel to the respondent in this case.] [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 8:16 am by law shucks
This case was also featured in the monthly “Deals & Suits” column in Corporate Counsel. [read post]
9 Aug 2014, 8:49 am by Charles (Chuck) Rubin
Supreme Court case discussing Bank Secrecy Act violations; however, not dealing with FBAR directly). [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 11:58 am by Anushka Limaye
A selected Federal Government candidate will be assigned to the equivalent of Executive Schedule Level V. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 11:46 am by Anushka Limaye
A selected Federal Government candidate will be assigned to the equivalent of Executive Schedule Level V. [read post]
16 May 2008, 8:03 am
– Discussion of  T Berg’s paper ‘IP and the preferential option for the poor’: (ISinIP), Patent valuation: differing analytical methods: (Hal Wegner) Global - Copyright Copyright as an engine of free expression? [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 4:25 am by Dianne Saxe
:  09-076/09-090/09-091   Superior Fine Papers Inc. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 2:00 am
(Public Knowledge)   US Copyright – Decisions S D Ohio: RIAA’s need for discovery was not so urgent: Elektra Entertainment Group, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 8:08 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  (Pity the Ford Motor Co., losing so much from resales!) [read post]
20 Apr 2024, 6:37 pm
Aaron Friedberg is Professor of Politics and International Affairs at Princeton University, where he has been a member of the faculty since 1987, and co-director of Princeton’s Center for International Security Studies. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 12:15 am
The doctrine of inherent anticipation (particularly after Schering Co. v Geneva Pharmaceuticals Inc. et Al., commented here - see also, in the UK, Merrell Dow v H N Norton & Co), may lead to similar distortions. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 6:45 am by Laurence H. Tribe
There is little doubt that Dominion’s suit for damages met and indeed exceeded the standard the Supreme Court established in 1964 in New York Times Co. v. [read post]