Search for: "Democratic Party v. Board of Elections"
Results 321 - 340
of 614
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Feb 2015, 6:19 am
Bruce Rauner, the newly elected Governor of Illinois, has launched what some see as direct attack on public unions. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 8:01 am
The insurrectionists were ultimately unable to block the Congressional certification of Joseph Biden as president-elect and Kamala Harris as vice president-elect. [read post]
12 Aug 2024, 4:00 am
With the addition of Walz, Democrats now have arguably the most anti-free speech ticket of a major party in more than two centuries. [read post]
29 May 2020, 7:52 am
This practice is fundamentally un-American and anti-democratic. [read post]
29 May 2020, 7:52 am
This practice is fundamentally un-American and anti-democratic. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 1:52 pm
Election years exacerbate the problem even further. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 4:21 am
In Rucho v. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 7:32 am
Davis, and NLRB v. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 2:41 pm
That was in the case of National Labor Relations Board v. [read post]
4 Jul 2018, 11:40 am
Casey, the 1992 decision reaffirming Roe v. [read post]
21 May 2019, 1:53 pm
Judge Mehta’s opinion provides a clear rejection of Trump’s arguments that Congress lacks a legitimate legislative purpose—an argument Trump is making across the board in order to reject oversight attempts by House Democrats. [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 9:58 am
Maffick v. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 10:43 am
In United States v. [read post]
21 Nov 2007, 8:34 am
A hedge fund also filed an access proposal at Reliant Energy, but the Texas-based company sought a court ruling that it was not bound by the AFSCME v. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 12:18 pm
[Note to readers: This morning, the Supreme Court handed down a decision in Moore v. [read post]
18 Aug 2017, 4:59 am
As of 2017, Nancy continues to serve as the leader of the Democratic party in the House for the 114th Congress. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 8:53 am
Mata v. [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 3:00 am
But the path to obtaining the information Democrats are seeking will be contentious. [read post]
11 Dec 2015, 3:50 am
The Court declared the entire Act to be unconstitutional but refused to suspend the order:[220] Both parties confined their submissions to the definition of cyberbullying and Part I of the Act. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 6:25 am
” Sixty votes would have broken the Republican filibuster, but it went straight down party lines, 51-44, with every Democrat voting to move the bill forward, and every Republican voting against. [read post]
