Search for: "Department of Justice v. Spring"
Results 321 - 340
of 589
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2012, 12:57 am
Full story: Department for Work and Pensions. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 2:59 am
Yesterday's 7-1 decision, with only Justice John Paul Stevens dissenting (Justice Stephen Breyer recused himself because his brother ruled on the lower court case), the high court ruled in favor of Monsanto in Monsanto Co. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 2:23 pm
Report from the Supreme Court: Arizona v. [read post]
9 Dec 2021, 6:25 am
Justice Department. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 3:21 am
First, citing Business Corporation Law § 508 and the Second Department’s decision in Essig v 5670 58 St. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 3:51 am
IRS: Expense v. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 1:12 pm
Chairman Leibowitz mentioned that Judge Katz cited extensively to the Department of Justice/FTC Horizontal Merger Guidelines (CCH Trade Regulation Reporter ¶13,100). [read post]
31 May 2009, 11:16 am
Department of State. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 12:41 pm
Sir Richard Arnold, Lord Justice of AppealFees: Fees are charged for this event from £8 - £35. [read post]
30 Sep 2023, 1:40 am
Kumar, American Journal of Criminal Law, Vol. 39, No. 2, Spring 2012. [read post]
22 May 2017, 8:22 am
Curuta v. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:27 pm
Evans v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 1:30 pm
I think it would require this “state-specific v. general competence” question to be addressed. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 11:16 pm
In the first of its two (possibly soon to be three) Google antitrust lawsuits, the Department of Justice filed a motion yesterday with the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, requesting that Judge Amit P. [read post]
15 Sep 2018, 5:26 am
David Laufman analyzed how the Department of Justice has made the Foreign Agents Registration Act a significant tool in addressing foreign influence operations in the U.S. [read post]
11 Mar 2022, 3:10 am
One of the most high profile cases on the Supreme Court's docket for next term is Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 4:00 am
Commissioner, in an opinion that apparently confused four of the nine Justices,8 the Court limited the scope of the term “Departments” in the Appointments Clause to “executive divisions like the Cabinet-level departments. [read post]
8 Jan 2007, 4:40 pm
This will be a very interesting early test of the new Justices' views on stare decisis. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 2:07 pm
In Peter v. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 9:34 am
IP scammers be warned: we want justice now! [read post]
