Search for: "Dept of Corrections"
Results 321 - 340
of 1,297
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jan 2019, 3:30 pm
Chase Blog, Jan. 2019) [text]"Justice Dept. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 4:59 am
., 92 AD3d 548, 549 [l51 Dept 2012]; Ulico, 56 AD3d at 8). [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 10:29 am
The Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (“OPR”) has spent five years drafting a comprehensive update to 30 sections of the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) Guidelines.[1] The updated text[2] (“Final Text”) ensures the Guidelines are consistent with recent court decisions, implements legislative changes, clarifies rules governing the CEQA process, and eliminates duplicative analysis. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 2:00 am
City of Toledo Police Dept., 785 F.3d 1128 (6th Cir. 2015). [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 12:30 am
Fenlon v Harris County and other taxing entities (No. 01-17-00877-CV (Tex.App. - Houston Dec 20, 2018) The record contains no indication that Fenlon, when he purchased the property, expressly agreed to assume liability for the delinquent taxes. [read post]
31 Dec 2018, 9:17 am
The Department of Corrections (DOC) has a duty to supervise offenders who are released on supervised probation. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 8:20 am
One may fairly question whether the court applied the correct D.C. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 8:20 am
One may fairly question whether the court applied the correct D.C. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 7:00 am
The Appellate Division found that PERB's determination was supported by substantial evidence in the record and although the vehicle requests were routinely approved, that fact did not create a past practice nor divest DOT of its right to exercise its discretion in granting or denying the requests or the use of the vehicle for commuting to and from work.Citing State of New York Dept. of Correctional Servs. v Kinsella, 220 AD2d 19, the court held that "because PERB's… [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 7:00 am
The Appellate Division found that PERB's determination was supported by substantial evidence in the record and although the vehicle requests were routinely approved, that fact did not create a past practice nor divest DOT of its right to exercise its discretion in granting or denying the requests or the use of the vehicle for commuting to and from work.Citing State of New York Dept. of Correctional Servs. v Kinsella, 220 AD2d 19, the court held that "because PERB's… [read post]
16 Dec 2018, 5:13 am
Voutsinas Schenone, 2018 WL 5811759 (NYAD 2 Dept. 11/7/2018) [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 3:45 pm
Moriarty, 106 F. 886, 891 (S.D.N.Y.1901)[2] 13 USC §195[3]Dept. of Commerce v. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 11:41 am
Last week, the Washington Supreme Court ruled unanimously that the Department of Corrections did not act grossly negligent in the supervision of a felon who killed his girlfriend. [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 11:00 pm
" However, there is no dispute that a hearing was never held.Accordingly, the Appellate Division concluded that Supreme Court was correct in determining that Jakubowicz's termination was arbitrary and capricious. [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 11:00 pm
" However, there is no dispute that a hearing was never held.Accordingly, the Appellate Division concluded that Supreme Court was correct in determining that Jakubowicz's termination was arbitrary and capricious. [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 12:20 pm
Wow.For some reason, I've never before commented on an opinion by Justice Streeter. [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 5:00 am
Accordingly, the Appellate Division concluded that Supreme Court was correct in determining that Jakubowicz's termination was arbitrary and capricious.* The Village submitted two appeals, denominated Appeal 1 and Appeal 2, but dismissed Appeal 1 as academic in view of its ruling with respect to Appeal 2.The decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2018/2018_02059.htm [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 5:00 am
Accordingly, the Appellate Division concluded that Supreme Court was correct in determining that Jakubowicz's termination was arbitrary and capricious.* The Village submitted two appeals, denominated Appeal 1 and Appeal 2, but dismissed Appeal 1 as academic in view of its ruling with respect to Appeal 2.The decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2018/2018_02059.htm [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 10:51 am
California Dept. of Corrections and Rehabilitation.) [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 4:06 pm
Village of Sharon Springs v Barr, 2018 WL 5046723 (NYAD 3 Dept. 10/18/2018) [read post]
