Search for: "Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs, interested parties"
Results 321 - 340
of 1,422
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Aug 2020, 1:50 pm
Illinois, 431 U.S. 720 (1977), Walgreen, an “indirect” Remicade purchaser, would lack antitrust standing to assert claims against Janssen (…) In Illinois Brick, the Supreme Court created a “direct purchaser” rule for antitrust claims, “providing that only entities that purchase goods directly from alleged antitrust violators have statutory standing to bring a lawsuit for damages. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 6:00 am
Before Howard could answer, however, Simpson falsely stated that Extell was the only party to show an interest in purchasing the Property (id.). [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 3:00 am
Plaintiffs appealed. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 7:22 am
Even after the U.K. decision the next day led the parties to terminate the deal, the DOJ pressed on to the U.S. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 9:31 am
The opinion – which marked “the third time the County’s attempt to adopt a viable climate action plan and related CEQA documents” had been before the Court – resolved consolidated appeals in three cases, in which the lead plaintiffs were Golden Door Properties, LLC and the Sierra Club. [read post]
27 Jun 2020, 9:20 am
Kurbanov ultimately profits from visitors by selling directed advertising space and data collected to third-party brokers, thus purposefully availing himself of the privilege of conducting business within Virginia. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 2:18 pm
I welcome guest post submissions from responsible authors on topics of interest to this blog’s readers. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 7:00 am
National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) jointly hosted a public meeting to obtain views from experts and interested parties regarding implementation of Section 889 on July 19, 2019. [read post]
6 Jun 2020, 4:59 pm
The plaintiffs requested damages, injunctive relief, pre- and post-judgment interest, and attorney fees as well as a jury trial. [read post]
22 May 2020, 6:00 am
NSO’s clients would be required parties only if excluding them would give WhatsApp insufficient relief, or if excluding the sovereign clients would prevent them from protecting some interest they may have in the lawsuit. [read post]
22 May 2020, 3:00 am
., raising concerns that a key U.S. attorney’s office handling multiple investigations of interest to President Trump is becoming further politicized. [read post]
18 May 2020, 7:54 am
This theory worked for those plaintiffs who purchased Google devices, but several plaintiffs either did not purchase Google devices or (in the case of minors) were not interacting with a device that they purchased. [read post]
15 May 2020, 8:17 am
In evaluating a motion for stay pending appeal we consider four factors: "(1) whether the stay applicant has made a strong showing that he is likely to succeed on the merits; (2) whether the applicant will be irreparably injured absent a stay; (3) whether issuance of the stay will substantially injure the other parties interested in the proceeding; and (4) where the public interest lies. [read post]
11 May 2020, 11:40 am
Prospects for Litigation Over COVID-19 Tracking Technologies One could hope that in the interest of banding together to fight a common enemy, plaintiffs’ attorneys would shy away from filing privacy lawsuits against companies that develop tracking technologies intended to aid in the fight against COVID-19. [read post]
11 May 2020, 3:19 am
So the question: where an LLC member misleads a co-member in connection with a potential sale of the business to a third party, is that a direct or derivative cause of action? [read post]
7 May 2020, 8:02 am
This is especially true in Asia Pacific (APAC) countries, many of which followed the EU’s lead in launching open banking platforms to more easily connect FIs, FinTechs and third parties over the past two years. [read post]
3 May 2020, 7:19 am
” Unlike the reporting in Shadle, they do not suggest that Plaintiff is engaged in any malfeasance, but rather that Plaintiff’s prices are too high or that its performance is inadequate. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 4:41 pm
Senate (‘‘Holding the Chinese Communist Party Accountable for Infecting Americans Act of 2020’’). [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 10:45 am
Facts Regarding the Plaintiff’s Injury and Bankruptcy Proceeding It is reported that in April 2018, the plaintiff purchased a battery-operated skateboard that was manufactured by the defendant. [read post]
19 Apr 2020, 9:00 am
Feb. 28, 2020): Even if, hypothetically, the Defendant’s customers realize the true source of the goods before they complete their purchase, there is still a likelihood of initial-interest confusion. [read post]
