Search for: "Doe 2" Results 321 - 340 of 146,141
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jun 2024, 5:50 am by Alexandre Skander Galand
However, the notification “must be sufficiently specific” for the State to assert its jurisdiction under Article 18(2) (para 110). [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 5:14 am by INFORRM
Ostensibly, the Editors’ Code of Practice is meant to protect the bereaved in these circumstances, so that death does not become a spectacle for morbid tastes. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 4:03 am by Jasmijn de Groot (Brinkhof)
As boring as the above information may sound, it becomes interesting when the Dutch translation does not correspond to the text of the claims as granted in English, French or German. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 3:31 am
The Club argued that Section 2(a) does not apply to collective membership marks but the Board disagreed. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 3:05 am by Zac Amos, ReHack
This small effort can limit the scope of data breaches. 2. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 1:42 am by Eleonora Rosati
Moreover, even if such knowledge were established, the Court highlighted that knowledge of prior use by third parties is just one factor; it alone does not establish bad faith. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 12:00 am
Arizona Revised Statute (ARS) 28-1381 is the primary misdemeanor DUI statute addressing driving under the influence (DUI) in Arizona. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 9:47 pm by Josh Blackman
Fewer than three hours later, around 2 a.m., the Supreme Court voted 5–4 to reverse us. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 9:05 pm by Dan Flynn
  The 2-year-old traveled to Kolkata from February 12 to 29. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 6:39 pm by Steven Gallagher and Gabrielle Gordon
The court based its decision on several points:    First, the operative “knowing and intentional” language does not appear in a liability provision, but instead in a penalty provision. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 3:12 pm by Dennis Crouch
Sanders, 556 U.S. 396 (2009), the Court construed § 7261(b)(2), the sister provision to § 7261(b)(1) at issue here. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 1:28 pm by bklemm@foley.com
That case argues that the DOL does not have the authority to implement a salary requirement at all for overtime exemptions. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 1:03 pm by sinclair
Consider What information does a potential client need to know in order to make a decision about your company? [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 12:19 pm by HRWatchdog
Does elective surgery qualify for CFRA/FMLA leave? [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 11:28 am by Scott Bomboy
But if the same official makes a statement clearly evoking official powers, the location does not matter. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 9:42 am by Eric Goldman
Uber’s re-do was a high-stakes affair because (1) it had no existing TOS in place, and (2) it knew judges would critically scrutinize its every decision in the inevitable legal challenge. [read post]