Search for: "Doe v. Holder"
Results 321 - 340
of 6,687
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2023, 9:05 pm
In the landmark case of Citizens United v. [read post]
2 May 2023, 11:39 am
How much does it cost to live in Cartagena? [read post]
2 May 2023, 12:29 am
The Staff Notice does not contain anything new – rather, it confirms that “positive” Voting Agreements (i.e., those requiring a security holder to vote for management’s recommendations) may require shareholder approval. [read post]
1 May 2023, 3:10 pm
The USPTO does not collect or publish licensing information, except when patent holders voluntarily record license agreements or voluntarily list their patents as available for licensing on the Patents 4 Partnerships Marketplace website, which currently is available for covid-19-related technologies. [read post]
1 May 2023, 8:45 am
State v. [read post]
30 Apr 2023, 5:23 pm
" In Hardin v. [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 2:04 am
As a supervisor or social superior (mentors, contract holders v. contractors, clients who need our help), our ask is often met with token compliance or a yes that is rooted in fearing negative consequences, e.g., will they fire me/end the contract/not represent me. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 11:04 am
As stated in the decision of the Court of Appeal in Erie Sand & Gravel Ltd. v. [read post]
22 Apr 2023, 11:27 am
Defendants from the automotive and telecommunications industries sometimes have approximately ten suppliers (example: Nokia v. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 8:49 am
Copyright ownership grants the holder several exclusive rights in regard to their copyrighted work, as laid out in §106 of the Copyright Act of 1976. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 12:45 am
It is superfluous for cases such as Ericsson v Apple, costly and lengthy for the litigants, and clogs the court system. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 7:07 pm
They could still identify Sisvel v. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 11:37 am
Under the discovery rule, an infringement claim does not “accrue” until the copyright holder discovers, or with due diligence should have discovered, the infringement. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 5:30 am
Quincy Bioscience, LLC v. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 4:01 am
Nor does it reference Grenelle’s operating agreement. [read post]
16 Apr 2023, 2:56 am
Does it include duplicative-royalty policies? [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 5:56 am
Perspective of major patent holder who is also a large-scal [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 5:43 am
Needless to say, a pre-release draft of proposed legislation does not carry the force of law, and as noted by Intellectual Asset Management and others, a lengthy legislative process lies ahead during which the EU Proposal could substantially change or be scuttled entirely. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 8:45 am
Under section 106 of the U.S Copyright Act, copyright infringement in this case is not limited to an individual copying the entire work but rather extends to the duplication of any substantial part of it, as well.[11] In addition to the right of reproduction are the rights to publicly display and perform the work, allowing the copyright holder to control the display and public performance of the work if it is literary, choreographic, audio visual, etc. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 1:18 pm
What does the platform do? [read post]
