Search for: "Doe v. Superior Court"
Results 321 - 340
of 7,687
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Nov 2019, 2:10 pm
The Superior Court affirmed the lower court ruling, finding that Birchfield did not apply retroactively. [read post]
5 Dec 2024, 7:30 am
The Superior Court applied these factors to Sudbury’s case and found that they met the standard for due diligence. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 3:46 pm
The first was "negligent marketing," which the Superior Court limited strictly to overpromotion:Appellant next argues that her claim for “negligent marketing” is cognizable under Baldino v. [read post]
17 May 2018, 7:30 pm
(internal citations omitted) The brief does not address the PTAB’s reasoning that sovereign immunity is waived by parallel district court litigation. [read post]
7 May 2012, 1:28 pm
The arbitration award was upheld by the Ontario Superior Court and Court of Appeal. [read post]
7 May 2012, 1:43 pm
The arbitration award was upheld by the Ontario Superior Court and Court of Appeal. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 9:31 pm
Finally, the Court held that the Supreme Court's decision in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
22 May 2017, 8:56 am
On May 22, 2017, by a vote of 5-2, the Supreme Court of Ohio dismissed Rush v. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 11:04 am
Superior Court (Sheridan) - B241137, filed August 16, 2012, the court held that employer’s failure to renew employee’s fixed-term contract does not give rise to a claim for wrongful termination in violation of public policy. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 4:10 am
In Beaton v. [read post]
13 Dec 2018, 1:52 pm
You can't really argue that much with today's opinion from the California Supreme Court. [read post]
23 Oct 2007, 11:30 am
In an unusual decision released October 5, 2007, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice relied on its parens patriae power to assume jurisdiction over two children who habitually resided with their father in Saudi Arabia at the time of the hearing.In Johnson v. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 6:04 am
” Romero v. [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 8:47 am
Jackson (election contest): https://electioncases.osu.edu/case/ward-v-jackson/ From the Maricopa County Superior Court Judge’s decision: “The Court finds no misconduct, no fraud, and no effect on the outcome of the election. [read post]
14 Mar 2007, 4:53 am
In Vaughn Development v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 9:41 am
Earlier this month, the Quebec Court of Appeal unanimously overturned the earlier 2008 Quebec Superior Court decision in Option Consommateurs v. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 9:50 am
Superior Court, 128 Cal. [read post]
20 May 2013, 7:38 am
The court of appeals in Friddle v. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 6:57 am
Case citation: Does #1-#90 v. [read post]
