Search for: "Doe v. Superior Court" Results 321 - 340 of 8,631
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Sep 2023, 5:21 pm
I say this with all sincerity: Thank you, Justice Petrou. [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 8:46 am by Mark Ashton
The Superior Court describes this as a 15 year odyssey of continuing custody litigation. [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 6:00 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
However, this does not mean that a matter filed in the Superior Court of Justice cannot be heard before a Small Claims Court. [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 6:00 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
However, this does not mean that a matter filed in the Superior Court of Justice cannot be heard before a Small Claims Court. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 10:30 pm by Tomasz Tadeusz Koncewicz
The Court chooses a superior principle to resolve the cases, and establishes brick-by-brick (or in President Lenaert’s words “stone by stone”) an internal hierarchy between various Treaty norms and values. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 5:14 am by Unknown
“We should not dissect [Providence’s] entrails to divine a prediction for future cases that does not make any sense,” the court wrote.The chancery court also rejected the plaintiff’s argument that if a formula does not create the same outcome for each share in the class, it creates de facto subclasses that violate Section 151(a). [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 10:26 am by Daniel J. Gilman
Here’s the Wall Street Journal under the demure title, “U.S. v. [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 6:00 am by Tad Lipsky
It did not consider or endorse any specific legislation, but the pathway suggested was reasonably clear from the relentless criticism of economic writings, judicial opinions (including most Supreme Court antitrust opinions dating from General Dynamics), and other landmark scholarship of antitrust law and economics of the past half-century. [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 1:06 pm by Joseph L. Hyde
The defendant first argued the trial court erred by denying his motion to disqualify superior court judge Thomas H. [read post]