Search for: "Doe v. Trump et al"
Results 321 - 340
of 354
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Sep 2019, 11:00 pm
“Tool Without A Handle: A Duty of Candor” The law and legal professional ethics require of counsel a duty of candor in the practice of law.[1] This includes a duty to not knowingly make false statements of fact, to not conceal controlling legal authority, and to not offer evidence the lawyer knows to be false.[2] These principles are considered essential to maintaining both substantive fairness for participants in the process, and trust in the integrity of the process for… [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 4:30 am
: (IAM), (Patent Circle), India takes open source approach to drug discovery: (Patent Lens), India: Indian Bayh Dole Bill: (Spicy IP), (Spicy IP), (Does India need Bayh-Dole? [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 2:16 pm
USA LLC, et al. v. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am
Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit in Folkens v Wyland. [read post]
25 Dec 2009, 10:24 am
See Monarch Casino & Resort, Inc. et al v. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 9:11 am
Moreover, this initiative may die or be limited with the new Trump administration. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 9:11 am
Moreover, this initiative may die or be limited with the new Trump administration. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 2:56 am
In Hantz Financial Services, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 5:01 am
However, what does vary between states is how private actors can respond to the policies: To clarify, it is the extent to which private actors and members of civil society can object to and change their government’s course of action. [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 7:45 pm
The passage makes for a curious mix of transatlantic policy objectives in the areas of steel sector decarbonization, carbon border adjustments, trade defence instruments, and inbound investment screening: Compatible with international obligations and the multilateral rules, including potential rules to be jointly developed in the coming years, each participant in the arrangements would undertake the following actions: (i) restrict market access for non-participants that do not meet conditions of… [read post]
8 Dec 2007, 9:03 am
" Marbury v. [read post]
16 Nov 2023, 12:24 pm
County of Ventura (Los Padres Forestwatch, et al., Interveners and Respondents) (2023) ___ Cal.App.5th ___. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On January 18, Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar filed an amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 1:43 pm
That rationale does not apply to online platforms. [read post]
18 Oct 2019, 6:30 am
Sullivan who would gladly have bankrupted the New York Times in a trumped-up defamation suit. [read post]
10 Sep 2016, 11:14 am
However, hope that we can get more consensus by going to empirical claims is probably futile, as Dan Kahan et al have said in many other legal contexts. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 4:04 pm
See Ariel Katz’s “game theory” analysis in his blog.I have been provided with a copy of a very interesting and widely distributed email dated April 16, 2012 (the date the agreement was announced) that was sent to presidents of Canadian universities et al by Paul Davidson, President of AUCC. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 10:58 am
This is a guest post from law professor Michael Trebilcock and lawyer Dan Poliwoda: THE TRIPS VACCINE WAIVER CONTROVERSY* By Michael Trebilcock Emeritus University Professor of LawUniversity of Toronto Dan Poliwoda Lawyer, Dickinson Wright LLP University of Toronto (J.D., 2020) July 12, 2021 *We acknowledge the invaluable research assistance of Daniel Scarpitti, University of Toronto, Faculty of Law, 2L, in preparing these comments. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 7:26 am
STEVEN WYNER et al., Defendants and Respondents. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 7:02 pm
Greenberg et al., 965 A.2d 763 (Del. [read post]
