Search for: "Doe v. United States of America et al" Results 321 - 340 of 598
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Nov 2019, 1:25 pm by Doyle, Barlow & Mazard PLLC
Twin America, LLC, et. al, Twin America, Coach, and City Sights together were required to pay $7.5 million in disgorgement to remedy alleged violations of Section 7 of the Clayton Act, Section 1 of the Sherman Act, as well as New York State law, including the Donnelly Act (see Proposed Final Judgment, United States v. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm by Josh Blackman
See, e.g., America's Constitution: A Biography 170-73, 556-57 (2006); Akhil Amar, America's Unwritten Constitution 17-19, 404 (2012); see also Akhil Amar, The Words That Made Us 472-465 (2021). [read post]
29 Nov 2021, 3:59 pm by Marjorie Dannenfelser
Wade and the all-encompassing definition of maternal health imposed by its companion case, Doe v. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 9:37 am
Hutin YJF, Pool V, Cramer EH, et al. (1999). [read post]
14 Aug 2010, 5:49 pm
Hutin YJF, Pool V, Cramer EH, et al [read post]
19 Nov 2017, 5:45 am by Barry Sookman
The CDA does not provide a basis for refusing to enforce the Equustek Order The only case relied upon by the California court for the legal proposition that the CDA gave Google immunity from the Equustek Order is Barnes v Yahoo. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 11:02 am by Kiera Flynn
Ian Ayres et al.Petitioner's reply CVS Pharmacy, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 7:20 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
Working Arrangements Across Employment Sectors by Percentage of Workers In their own survey, Barrero et al. measured the full-time working arrangements in the United States as of 2023, identifying the percentage of employees who work fully onsite, fully remote, and those who have a hybrid arrangement. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 2:46 am by Kelly
Ambu A/S (Filewrapper) District Court W D Pennsylvania: Convenience of false marking plaintiff ‘in the business of litigation’ given little weight in venue dispute: United States of America, ex rel. et. al. v. [read post]