Search for: "Does 1 - 29" Results 321 - 340 of 13,770
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am by Eugene Volokh
Respectfully, we also write to raise serious concerns about the reliability of Professor Lash's writings on Section 3 and to make clear what the historical record does—and does not—say.[1] By answering seven questions, we will show that (1) there was a First Insurrection, (2) John B. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
On January 29, 2024, Acting Comptroller of the Currency Michael Hsu spoke at the University of Michigan Stephen M. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 7:45 pm by Josh Blackman
On January 29, Luttig was the lead signatory of an amicus brief to the Supreme Court, which was joined by Peter Keisler, Larry Thompson, Stuart Gerson, and Donald Ayer. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 3:36 am by Eleonora Rosati
Moreover, it explores the challenges that a high-tech environment presents for IP, in particular trade marks, designs, GIs, and copyright.The conference gathers influential figures drawn from private practice, judiciary, academia, and major IP offices to engage in discussions.Having participated in the past, I can say that the conference is truly interactive as it is designed to encourage exchanges among participants through panel debates, each covering four key topics related to a specific… [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 5:22 am by Eliav Lieblich
Then, I argue that the geographical nexus requirement, in fact, is extremely difficult to defend in terms of the lex lata, legal policy, literature or practice.[1] This piece does not, however, discuss in detail the obligations in fact owed to Protected Persons in situations or territories once the geographic nexus requirement is rejected. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 6:05 am by The Murray Law Firm
LOCAL NEWS Gunfire rang out at a Elkhorn, WI bar early Thursday morning, Feb 1, 2024, leaving two people dead. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 9:50 am by Joel R. Brandes
After their divorce, they negotiated a custody agreement (the “Custody Agreement”), which they executed on May 29, 2019. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 7:27 am by Marty Lederman
  Therefore the state court decision in this case does not, as far as I can tell, affect whether Trump appears on the November ballot.) [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 7:00 am by Norman L. Eisen
.: IND-71543-23 Charging documents and arraignment State of New York response to Trump request for a bill of particulars (May 16, 2023) Trump request for bill of particulars (April 27, 2023) Arraignment hearing transcript (April 4, 2023) Trump Indictment (indicted on March 30, 2023 released on April 4, 2023) and statement of facts (April 4, 2023) Order on media access to Trump arraignment (April 3, 2023) Motions to Dismiss State of New York sur-reply in opposition to Trump omnibus motions (Nov. 27,… [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 4:32 am
" Applicant "[did] not clearly testify that she actually did [arrange for an adoption] as of the Application filing date [June 29, 2018] or otherwise, nor does the record show corroborating evidence of such activities in 2018. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
Moab Partners LP,[1] a closely followed case that ought to address whether a purported failure to make a disclosure required under Item 303 of U.S. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 12:30 pm by Unknown
"Maternal Health Outcomes in the Context of Fragility: A Retrospective Study from Lebanon," Conflict and Health, 17:59 (Dec. 2023)- Authors (11) = Lebanon (9, incl. lead), United Arab Emirates (1), Spain (1)- APC = USD 2990"No Choice but Welcoming Refugees: The Non-Refoulement Principle as Customary International Law in Indonesia," Lentera Hukum, 10:1 (2023)- Authors (3) = Indonesia (2, incl. lead), Hungary (1)- APC = IDR 3,000,000"On the… [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 6:22 am by Guest Author
Cargill this term, the Court has been asked to decide the narrow question of whether a bump stock device is a “machinegun” as defined in the National Firearms Act.[1] However, embedded within the case is an issue that raises broad administrative law questions about how the rule of lenity interacts with agencies’ interpretations of statutes with criminal implications. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm by renholding
 The upshot: so long as a defendant says what the SEC wants to hear (or says nothing at all), he does not violate the No-Admit-No-Deny Provision. [read post]