Search for: "Does 1-95" Results 321 - 340 of 3,682
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jun 2010, 1:40 pm by Hunton & Williams LLP
  For browsers to deliver valid consent, they should (1) reject third-party cookies by default, and (2) convey clear, comprehensive and fully visible information. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
The Board, however, does not agree with this argument. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
Hrynew, 2014 SCC 71 [1] The key issues on this appeal come down to two, straightforward questions: Does Canadian common law impose a duty on parties to perform their contractual obligations honestly? [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 11:08 am by Bill Marler
Of those cases, 95 percent are related to foodborne causes. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 1:17 am by Miquel Montañá
In particular, in the decision handed down on 7 March 2018, the Spanish Supreme Court referred the following questions to the CJEU: “1) Does Article 96 of the Plant Variety Regulation oppose an interpretation whereby an action under Articles 94 and 95 of the Plant Variety Regulation is time barred if filed more than three years after grant and after acquiring knowledge of the act and the identity of the liable party, although the acts of infringement still persist at… [read post]
17 Apr 2009, 9:16 am
Would BBLP's goals be met if 95% of the graduates of the "selective" law schools became associates at kindler, gentler BigLaw providing legal services to 1% of society? [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 8:56 am by Jessica Kroeze
The subsequent Auxiliary request 2 and Auxiliary request 3 both contained an additional independent claim (i.e., claim 2).Claims 1 and 2 of auxiliary request 2 were based on combinations of claims 1 and 2 and claims 1 and 9 as granted respectively. [read post]
22 Jan 2022, 12:17 pm by Brett Trout
But what does that mean? [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 6:36 am by Robert Brammer
Compiling a federal legislative history may seem intimidating at first glance, but it does not have to be. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 3:03 pm by Oliver G. Randl
As a matter of fact, in those cases the limitation does not result from the individualisation of particular combinations as in the present case, but conserve the generic nature of the chemical formula defining the claimed products (T 615/95 [6] and T 50/70 [2.1, 3rd paragraph]).[3.5] Consequently, the amendment of claim 1 according to the main request extends the subject-matter of the patent beyond the content of the application as filed and, therefore, does not… [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 12:22 pm by Mark Terry
Protection for an architectural work created as a work made for hire on or after December 1, 1990, lasts for 95 years from the date of publication of the work or for 120 years from the date of creation of the work, whichever term is less. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
 [8] The appellant-opponent has argued that claim 1 does not fulfil one prerequisite to qualify as a second medical use-claim in accordance with G 5/83, namely that a “medicament” is used in the treatment. [read post]
8 Apr 2017, 4:50 am
Thus, the grounds for refusal sub Article 3(1)(b)-(d) do not ensure that a certain sign is generally kept free for use over time.Unlike the absolute grounds for refusal sub Article 3(1)(b)-(d), the absolute ground relating to shapes (Article 3(1)(e) of the Trade Mark Directive) cannot be overcome by acquired distinctiveness [para 79] and, overall, “it overwhelmingly seeks to protect competition” [para 80, referring… [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 3:28 am by Joe
You then proceed to identify four replacement properties, each with a value of $1 million. [read post]