Search for: "Downloader 54"
Results 321 - 340
of 717
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Oct 2013, 6:31 am
The entire essay may be downloaded through the Social Science Research Network website.IV. [read post]
20 Oct 2013, 5:01 pm
Should you wish to download the whole decision, just click here.The file wrapper can be found here. [read post]
13 Oct 2013, 5:01 pm
The metal powder of claim 1 is thus novel and has an inventive step.Should you wish to download the whole decision, just click here.The file wrapper can be found here.Today I would like to pose my readers a question: It is established case law (I believe) that “in general, a document disclosing a chemical compound and its manufacture makes available this compound to the public in the sense of A 54 in all grades of purity as desired by a person skilled in the art”. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 5:01 pm
It is also noted that the above reasoning, which had been communicated as preliminary opinion of the board in its communication under Article 15(1) RPBA (cf. point V above), was not contested by any party at the oral proceedings (OPs) before the board.Should you wish to download the whole decision, just click here.The file wrapper can be found here. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 5:01 pm
This is a noteworthy decision on search-related matters.The application under consideration was filed as a PCT application with the USPTO in 2005. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 6:05 am
Posted by AdminEditor's Note: This article was originally published on Bloomberg Law Reports ®. [read post]
8 Sep 2013, 5:01 pm
If that technical feature has not been previously made available to the public by any of the means as set out in A 54(2), then the claimed invention is novel, even though such technical effect may have inherently taken place in the course of carrying out what has previously been made available to the public. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 5:01 pm
Should you wish to download the whole decision (in German), just click here.The file wrapper can be found here. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 9:43 am
Id. at 1353–54. [read post]
27 Aug 2013, 5:01 pm
Therefore, the Board comes to the conclusion, for the above reasons, that the subject-matter of claim 1 lacks novelty within the meaning of A 54(3). [read post]
23 Aug 2013, 6:07 pm
A preliminary total of 4,383 fatal work injuries were recorded in the United States in 2012, down from a revised count of 4,693 fatal work injuries in 2011, according to results from the Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries (CFOI) conducted by the U.S. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 5:01 pm
This is a revocation appeal.Claim 1 of the main request before the Board (and claim 1 as granted) read (in English translation):Process for recovering clear solutions containing cell contents from biological samples in a high throughput process, comprising the steps of(a) preparing a plurality of protein-containing solutions which contain insoluble ingredients in separate chambers of a multi-chamber filtration unit,(b) removing insoluble ingredients by filtering the solutions through the… [read post]
4 Aug 2013, 5:01 pm
T 836/01 and T 1642/06, on claims relating to second or further medical uses of a known substance and which acknowledged novelty in the case at issue based on the differentiation of a direct and indirect effect.[12] In view of the foregoing, the board is satisfied that the subject-matter of claim 1 at issue fulfils the requirements of A 54(1) and A 54(3) vis-à-vis the disclosure in document D1.Should you wish to download the whole decision, just click here.The file… [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 5:01 pm
It is thus not incumbent on the EPO to prove the contrary of what the [applicant] has merely alleged.The Board thus reaches the conclusion that document D7 is to be taken into consideration as the closest prior art.Should you wish to download the whole decision, just click here.The file wrapper can be found here. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 5:01 pm
Thus E6 is not state of the art within the meaning of A 54(2).[4.2] The [opponent] explains that there was no implicit secrecy agreement because such an agreement was only concluded for strategically important projects. [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 5:01 pm
In the board’s opinion, an apportionment of costs is appropriate under each of the provisions of Article 16(1)(a), (c) and (e) RPBA.[54] The [patent propr [read post]
23 Jul 2013, 2:46 pm
Online S2P2J includes a search feature and download capability as well as link features to access individual book sections, appendices, footnotes, cases and statutes. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 6:19 pm
My article, "The Cooperative as a Proletarian Corporation: The Global Dimensions of Property Rights and the Organization of Economic Activity in Cuba" has just been published and will appear in Northwestern Journal of International Law and Business 33:527-618 (2013). [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 8:25 am
Sara Seck is an Associate Professor at the University of Western Ontario. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 5:01 pm
The decisions invoked by the patent proprietor all concern the situation where the content of the disclosure was to be assessed on the basis of the figures only, which is not the case here.[1.4] As D3 discloses all the features of claim 1, the subject-matter of this claim is not novel (A 54).Should you wish to download the whole decision (in German), just click here.The file wrapper can be found here. [read post]
