Search for: "Downloader 94"
Results 321 - 340
of 392
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Dec 2023, 2:04 pm
The median fixed-broadband connection in the United States now delivers more than 207 Mbps download service, an 80% increase over the pre-pandemic median speed. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 1:01 am
Available as an unabridged digital download from Penguin Audio (2014). [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 7:00 am
Title 1 D0821294 Tire 2 10008830 High-voltage extender for connecting a spark plug to a high-voltage source 3 10008375 Systems and methods for analyzing an extracted sample 4 10008374 Systems and methods for transfer of ions for analysis 5 10007592 Debugging non-deterministic embedded systems 6 10006927 Method of operating a laboratory automation system and a laboratory automation system 7 10006913 Fluorescent-HAP: a diagnostic stain for HBV cores in cells 8 10006705 Methods for treating tissue… [read post]
11 Jul 2010, 3:01 pm
T 790/92 [4.6]; T 953/94 [3.1]; T 1161/04 [4.5]; T 1567/05 [3.7]; T 756/06 [13]). [read post]
2 Sep 2020, 6:30 am
You can download the survey from Thomson Reuters: 2020 State of U.S. [read post]
31 May 2015, 1:02 am
Available as an unabridged digital download from Penguin Audio (2014). [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 3:19 pm
Download from SSRN. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 3:01 pm
[7.1] According to the established jurisprudence of the Boards of Appeal it is necessary, in order to assess inventive step, to establish the closest state of the art, to determine in the light thereof the technical problem which the invention addresses and successfully solves, and to examine the obviousness of the claimed solution to this problem in view of the state of the art. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 3:32 am
Additional Sources To download a copy of the 2022 Cost of a Data Breach Report, please visit: https://www.ibm.com/security/data-breach. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 6:01 pm
J 37/89 [4.2-3]).[1.2] Irrespective of the fact that the representative of the appellant himself bears the costs for the appeal proceedings, the Board considers – in favour of the appellant, in the name of which the appeal has been filed – that it is the appellant itself and not its representative – who, from the procedural point of view, is not adversely affected – that is party to the appeal proceedings.[1.3] The other requirements of A 106 to 108 are fulfilled; the appeal… [read post]
4 Jan 2023, 2:22 pm
FOOTNOTES [1] CEC’s plan can be downloaded from the linked website. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 7:45 am
Download as PDF [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 10:10 am
[T]he website hotfile.com merely allows users to upload and download copyrighted material without volitional conduct from Hotfile or [the owner]. . . . [read post]
9 Apr 2022, 7:01 am
Damages incurred from ransomware amount to $20 billion in 2021, which is 57 times higher than the damages in 2015. 94% of organizations hit by ransomware were able to retrieve the encrypted data [read post]
15 May 2012, 2:09 pm
The fact that they lost 94 of 99 complaints is telling. [read post]
5 Feb 2012, 5:01 pm
The opponent filed an appeal against the decision of the Opposition Division (OD) maintaining the patent in amended form.Claim 1 as upheld by the OD read: “1. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 3:01 pm
When reading the book, he/she would find, among other things, that the second section of part VI.E.6.2.2.c) mentions, in its discussion of the decision in case T 828/94, that a monitoring system “should contain an independent cross-check” (emphasis by the Board) and could understand this to mean that such a cross-check does not mandatorily have to be implemented but rather is optional. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 5:01 pm
It is not possible to remedy deficiencies after the expiration of the time limit for filing an opposition if the justification of the opposition is insufficient (see T 522/94). [read post]
8 May 2013, 5:01 pm
From this it becomes clear that the EBA took note of the case law at that time but in fact did not approve of an unlimited application of this principle, but rather followed the ratio decidendi of J 12/94, see G 2/97 [4.2]. [read post]
1 May 2013, 5:01 pm
This is an appeal against the revocation of the opposed patent. [read post]
