Search for: "EUGENE GEORGE"
Results 321 - 340
of 781
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jul 2017, 5:28 am
Perhaps a more apt allusion would have been to George R.R. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 6:07 am
Posted by the Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance, on Friday, October 16, 2020 Editor's Note: This roundup contains a collection of the posts published on the Forum during the week of October 9–15, 2020. 2020 Proxy Season Review Posted by Benjamin Colton and Robert Walker, State Street Global Advisors, on Friday, October 9, 2020 Tags: Board composition, Climate change, COVID-19, Diversity, Engagement, ESG, Institutional… [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 9:39 am
Like our fellow Americans, we at FIRE have been gripped by the aftermath of George Floyd's killing in Minneapolis and the subsequent protests and disturbances in our cities. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 11:33 am
The opinion, just handed down today, is Zimmerman v. [read post]
4 Jul 2017, 12:00 pm
A funny observation from Texas Supreme Court Justice Don Willett: OTD 1776— Thomas Jefferson was putting final touches on the greatest break-up letter of all time. pic.twitter.com/xGJgBWaFuu — Justice Don Willett (@JusticeWillett) July 3, 2017 Puts me in mind of three short passages from Jefferson’s rough draft: we must endeavor to forget our former love for them …. we might have been a free & great people together …. the road to glory & happiness is open to… [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 7:22 am
I'm delighted to report that Prof. [read post]
19 May 2015, 8:01 am
Wolfenstein, Eugene Victor. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 3:30 pm
Wolfenstein, Eugene Victor. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 10:37 am
Jones, president and founder of the Public Religion Research Institute, Eugene Scott, a national political reporter at the Washington Post, and Mona Charen, policy editor at The Bulwark. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 9:03 am
[As to George, t]here was testimony admitted without objection or limitation, that George sent Geor [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 4:02 pm
George Mason Univ. (4th Cir. 1993). [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 7:22 am
"Political Opinion," Expressly Including a Broad Range of Views: Maryland Counties Harford, Howard, and Prince George's Counties (Md.) ban discrimination in public accommodations and housing based on "political opinion," defined (with immaterial variation among the ordinances) as "the opinions of persons relating to government, or the conduct of government; or related to political parties authorized to participate in primary elections in the State. [read post]
28 Aug 2021, 11:34 am
Affiliates of the Center have gone on to obtain desirable academic positions at numerous law schools including Georgetown, Chicago, UCLA, George Washington, Texas, Notre Dame, Hastings, Penn State, Georgia, and Richmond, among others. [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 11:16 am
Rector & Visitors of George Mason Univ. also discusses whether there is a constitutional right to engage in consensual BDSM sex. [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 10:40 am
. * * * I blogged Wednesday about a federal district court’s decision to strike down a George Mason University speech code; but the incident leading to the decision involved not just a student’s speech, but also his alleged sexual misconduct. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
Code of Ordinances §§ 95-3, -5 (2022), https://ecode360.com/HA0904 ("political opinion," defined as "The opinion of persons relating to government or the conduct of government or related to political parties authorized to participate in primary elections in the state"); Prince George's County (Md.) [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 8:15 am
George Tucker in his 1803 edition of Blackstone; so did Thomas Jefferson in 1815. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 2:34 pm
Hardin (Iowa Supreme Court, 1993): Hardin’s testimony at trial revealed that he and his friends viewed the event as an opportunity to personally convey to the President [George H.W. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 6:05 am
At least one, George Washington, directly solicited such business, as I have demonstrated. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 10:30 pm
(Orin Kerr) In his post below, Eugene notes the new decision in Brown v. [read post]
