Search for: "Edwards v. Price" Results 321 - 340 of 552
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Aug 2008, 5:33 pm
Price £225 (excluding delivery). [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 4:49 am
Price US$ $162. [read post]
This appeared to be a settled approach and is in line with the approach taken by Henry Carr J in Evalve v Edwards Lifesciences [2019]. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 3:55 pm by ihwiner
  While a pro-employee trend may mean higher prices as companies try to pass on at least some of the new costs to customers, the public should benefit from more reliable and safer services. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 5:36 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
The appeal was heard at the Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit Court in front of Circuit Judge Tatel and Senior Circuit Judges Edwards and Ginsburg. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 5:03 pm by INFORRM
However, if appropriately regulated, the impact on participants (as discussed in the article) “may be an acceptable price for truly open and public proceedings“. [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 10:51 am by Ian Patterson
In resolving the case, the ASBCA turned to the longstanding contracting doctrine first developed in G.L Christian & Associates v. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 3:55 pm by ihwiner
  While a pro-employee trend may mean higher prices as companies try to pass on at least some of the new costs to customers, the public should benefit from more reliable and safer services. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 8:15 am by Jordan M. Rand
The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU), in the matter of Maximillian Schrems v. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 9:22 am
 Price £115 (but if you buy it from the publisher online, it's only £103.50. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 7:00 pm by Howard Gutman
Expert Testimony Edward Clayton, (Clayton), testified on behalf of Pascarella, as an expert auto mechanic. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 3:03 pm by Kevin LaCroix
[v] Thinking we would need to work our way through the details of complying with the current statutory conflict-of-interest safe harbors of Chapter 607, we consulted with Gary Teblum, my partner who was active in the recent revision of Chapter 607. [read post]