Search for: "Electronics For Imaging, Inc." Results 321 - 340 of 1,165
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Dec 2019, 7:34 am by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
Indianapolis, Indiana – Attorneys for Plaintiff, Dean Potter LLC (“Potter LLC”), an Indiana limited liability company, filed suit in the Southern District of Indiana alleging that Defendants, LG Electronics USA, Inc. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 3:03 am by John L. Welch
The Alaris Group, Inc., Oppositions Nos. 91177234, 91177365, and 91177367, and Cancellation No. 92048172 [Consolidated Section 2(d) proceeding concerning likelihood of confusion between Plaintiff's mark ALARIS for various medical products and services relating to intravenous (“IV”) medication delivery and infusion therapy, patient monitoring and related products and services, and Defendant's marks ALARIS SELECT, ALARIS ADVANTAGE, ALARISWARE, and ALARIS for… [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 8:17 am by Sheldon Toplitt
Image via WikipediaRuling that the interests of certain freelance authors were not adequately represented, the U.S. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 4:40 am by Rob Robinson
Provided for your review/use is this week's snapshot update of key industry news and views highlighting key electronic discovery related stories, developments, and announcements.eDiscovery NewsContext for Applying DiscoveryAdmissibility of Email Strings and Co-Conspirator Emails - http://kuex.us/47c7California's New E-Discovery Rules vs. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 9:24 am by Jenna Greene
(formerly known as Silicon Graphics Inc.) over patents related to consumer electronics and display technology. [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 1:12 pm
About Juritek Juritek provides electronic discovery, advanced image processing and online document review services for lawyers. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 10:00 am by James Kachmar
On June 7, 2023, the Ninth Circuit issued its opinion in VHT, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 10:23 am
 The court explained the purpose of the Act as follows, quoting from a previous decision in Electronics for Imaging, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 5:01 pm by Eric Schweibenz
Patent Nos. 6,665,003 (the ‘003 patent) and 7,477,284 (the ‘284 patent): Sony Corporation of Japan Sony Corporation of America of New York, New York Sony Electronics, Inc. of San Diego, California Sony Mobile Communications AB of England Sony Mobile Communications (USA) Inc. of Atlanta, Georgia According to the complaint, HumanEyes is the exclusive licensee of the asserted patents, both related to improved methods of generating 3D images. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 12:24 pm by Cicely Wilson
Elecs. for Imaging, Inc., US Federal Circuit (7/11/14)PatentsDigital image processing involves electronically capturing an image of a scene with a “source device,” such as a digital camera, altering the image in a desired fashion, and transferring the altered image to an “output device,” such as a color printer. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 12:00 am
These are just some of the compelling arguments [seriously] that the fifth chamber of the Court of Justice of the European Communities considered in this case between Apple and Pear Industries.BackgroundBack in 2014 on the 25th July, Pear Technologies Ltd filed an application for the figurative mark shown right, for an EU trade mark in Classes 9, 35, and 42, which included the following:Class 9: ‘Personal computers; laptop computers; handset and tablet mobile digital electronic… [read post]