Search for: "England v. Cir*"
Results 321 - 340
of 2,591
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Dec 2013, 6:25 am
Wainer filed for divorce in the Principal Registry of the Family Division, London, England (the "London Action"). [read post]
2 Oct 2018, 3:00 am
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s of London v. [read post]
8 May 2012, 6:42 am
(i) Stanford International Bank Limited (acting by its joint liquidators) (Appellant) v Director of the Serious Fraud Office (Respondent); and (ii) Stanford International Bank (acting by its joint liquidators) (Respondent) v The Director of the Serious Fraud Office (Appellant) (Oral Hearing) Earlier this year, the Supreme Court heard a complex dispute arising from the collapse of Stanford International Bank (“SIB”) in early 2009. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 7:04 am
However, that is no longer the case, in significant part because the Education (Pupil Registration) (England) (Amendment) Regulations 2013, regulation 2 makes clear that such leave should be granted only in “exceptional circumstances”. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 3:45 am
In England and Wales, section 9 of the Defamation Act 2013 provides that a court does not have jurisdiction to hear an action against a person not domiciled in the UK, EU or a Lugano Convention state “unless the court is satisfied that, of all the places in which the statement complained of has been published, England and Wales is clearly the most appropriate place in which to bring an action in respect of the statement”. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 6:59 am
On the other side of the political spectrum, a report by the NHS Confederation (which represents most hospital trusts in England) entitled "The NHS and future free trade agreements" states that the NHS and patients will be faced with billions more to pay for drugs. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 2:45 pm
(The New England case is Pedersen v. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 4:05 am
In honour of the birth (in England) of the new FTT(PC), I bring you a little note about case from the UT(LC), all about forgetting old things.Jastrzembski v Westminster CC [2013] UKUT 284 (LC) concerns some major works. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 4:05 am
In honour of the birth (in England) of the new FTT(PC), I bring you a little note about case from the UT(LC), all about forgetting old things.Jastrzembski v Westminster CC [2013] UKUT 284 (LC) concerns some major works. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 4:30 pm
Of note on account of the fact that it pitches one seasoned manipulator of the media against another is Paul Burrell v Max Clifford [2015] EWHC 2001 (Ch), a High Court, Chancery Division, decision from England and Wales, delivered by Mr Justice Mann on 25 June 2015. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 8:29 am
Mozes v. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 9:00 am
Ellington v. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 5:29 pm
A long-running saga came to an end at the High Court in London on 7 October 2011, in Adelson v Anderson [2011] EWHC 2497 (QB). [read post]
18 Oct 2003, 11:50 am
R v G and another (2003)HL (R v Gemmell and Richards) DD aged 11 and 12 went camping without their parents approval. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 9:43 am
Download CRT v Barr. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 12:22 pm
Petition for certiorari was denied in Seminole Tribe v. [read post]
26 Feb 2023, 4:37 pm
Madam Justice Horsman’s decision in Canfield v. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 11:46 am
Principles of Baz v Steele, referenced above (albeit only a County Court level judgment) is relevant to the subject of a notices validity on the old form, where served between 29th September and any update to the formal notice. [read post]
28 Mar 2024, 2:05 pm
I just learned it from Third Circuit Judge Cheryl Krause's dissent from denial of rehearing en banc in Lara v. [read post]
