Search for: "England v. Cir*"
Results 321 - 340
of 2,591
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jan 2022, 5:01 am
Dobbs v. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 9:26 am
The Supreme Court will also give its judgement in the case of Harpur Trust v Brazel which considered how the holiday entitlement for those working only part of a year should be calculated. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 4:41 pm
The only case that succeeded in Northern Ireland that may have been knocked out under s 1 in England and Wales is the case of Coulter v Sunday Newspapers Ltd. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 7:36 am
It's an odd way to entice people to register...JL: Well, we borrowed incontestability from England, where it works. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 10:52 pm
By contrast, courts in California and Canada have found a contractual jurisdiction and applicable law clause invalid as a matter of public policy in order to allow a class action privacy claim to proceed against Facebook.[6] In England, the dual challenge of jurisdiction and collective actions in a mass privacy infringement claim has presented itself before the English Courts, first in Vidal-Hall v Google before the Court of Appeal in 2015[7] and in the Supreme Court judgment of… [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 12:00 pm
In Milieudefensie et al. v. [read post]
27 Dec 2021, 3:14 am
Picture on left is scanned by Philip V. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 9:01 pm
In the 2000 case of Vermont Agency of Natural Resources v. [read post]
14 Dec 2021, 9:15 am
Breeze v. [read post]
The appearance of a substantial defence in possession claims, and property guardians and possession.
6 Dec 2021, 2:56 pm
Stewart v Watts (2016) EWCA Civ 1247, an almshouse case (our report). [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 4:46 pm
Co. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 5:01 am
Southern New England Telephone Co. [read post]
30 Nov 2021, 11:01 am
” This also applied to Part VII Housing Act 1996 inquiries – R v Kensington and Chelsea LBC, Ex p Bayani (1990) 22 HLR 406; Cramp v Hastings BC (2005) EWCA Civ 1005, (2005) HLR 48 at [58]; Williams v Birmingham City Council (2007) EWCA Civ 691, (2008) HLR 4. [read post]
30 Nov 2021, 1:52 am
Bott & Co Solicitors v Ryanair DAC, heard 20 May 2021 In the matter of an application by Margaret McQuillan for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), In the matter of an application by Mary McKenna for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), and In the matter of an application by Francis McGuigan for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), heard 14-16 June 2021 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 R (on the application… [read post]
27 Nov 2021, 2:16 am
The core argument was that the action will be statute-barred in England if the action was stayed before the Nigerian Court. [read post]
25 Nov 2021, 6:00 am
Do you think the history and culture of England and Wales means we are unlikely to accept a general duty of good faith? [read post]
19 Nov 2021, 7:30 am
" "Roe v. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 6:42 pm
”[2] G v H (1994) A good starting point in discussing the issue of who is a parent is G v. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 6:42 pm
”[2] G v H (1994) A good starting point in discussing the issue of who is a parent is G v. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 3:47 am
FA v MA [2021] The mother had failed to comply with the orders of the court which stated that the father was to have contact with the child. [read post]