Search for: "English v. Stevens" Results 321 - 340 of 385
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Oct 2012, 3:21 am by New Books Script
l al-fiqh / by Ihsan Abdul-Wajid Bagby. 1986 v, 244 leaves ; 28 cm. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 2:46 pm by Susan Landau
  The POL, an English and Welsh firm, is a big business with 17,000 branches. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 2:46 pm by Susan Landau
  The POL, an English and Welsh firm, is a big business with 17,000 branches. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 12:39 pm
But the notion that democracy would be advanced – saved, “restored” – by limiting speech is nothing but a perversion of the English language. [read post]
17 Oct 2009, 2:12 pm
” said Steven Epstein, a Northwestern University sociologist who has been studying social issues surrounding the vaccine. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 9:31 am by Amanda L. Tyler
” Neither the Supreme Court’s earlier immigration decision in INS v. [read post]
6 Apr 2013, 1:42 am by INFORRM
More than simply ‘fat’, it goes to Silva’s professional ethos – arguably far more than the question of Steven Berkoff’s physical appearance did as an actor, in the infamous split Court of Appeal decision in Berkoff v Burchill (1996). [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 1:43 am by Matthieu Dhenne (Dhenne Avocats)
Or that the credibility of the technical effect is assessed at the priority or filing date (e.g., TGI Paris, October 6, 2009, RG n°07/16446, Teva v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 9:55 am by Geoffrey Rapp
Holthaus,, Jr., Note, Ed O’Bannon v. [read post]
12 Oct 2013, 10:34 am by Joey Fishkin
 Judge Posner, who is out promoting his 40th book, reflected in the interview [see around 8:45-10:45] on his opinion in Crawford v. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
But a cursory comparison of the equivalent piece of Australian federal legislation  to the legislation at issue in Loper Bright Enterprises v Raimondo suggests it is at least not true in all cases. [read post]
15 Jun 2019, 8:00 am by Guest Blogger
Jaffa -- I also draw extensively from constitutional argument advanced by lawyers in The American Bar Association Journal, journalists like James Jackson Kilpatrick in National Review (and elsewhere), literature scholars/English Professors (the late Jeffrey Hart; M.E. [read post]
I thought we might talk a little bit about what is probably the leading case on dress codes, Jespersen v. [read post]