Search for: "Ex Parte Moore" Results 321 - 340 of 362
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Dec 2008, 4:24 pm
Perhaps the most intriguing part of the study is the musings about what impact the financial crisis might have on future settlements. [read post]
13 Dec 2008, 12:13 am
Jefferson Cnty     Eastern District of Tennessee at Knoxville KAREN NELSON MOORE, Circuit Judge. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 11:45 am
The security of human rights and the safety of free 4 institutions require freedom of action on the part of the court. [read post]
22 Nov 2008, 4:09 am
The depression was"on the right hand side under the front part, the front section,what was the porch" and was about "two to three feet under thehouse" (R. 133, 135). [read post]
30 Aug 2008, 4:20 pm
8-30-2008 New Jersey:TRENTON -- New Jersey is in the midst of an ambitious pilot program to find out what combination of services works best at keeping ex-inmates from returning to state prisons after they're released.The $2 million program, called "Another Chance," is part of the state's stepped-up efforts to lessen the percentage of ex-cons who re-enter state prison. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 4:53 pm
The Webisodes feature new associate Nick Conley, who works at Sullivan & Moore, "the most prestigious law firm in the entire country. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 7:06 pm
Reyeros, No. 06-1485, 06-1486 Convictions and sentence for conspiracy to import cocaine are affirmed where: 1) there was sufficient evidence that defendant knew the specific object of the conspiracy; 2) documents in the possession of a foreign sovereign and never seen by the government were not subject to Brady or Jencks disclosure; 3) there was no individual or cumulative unfairness in the court's rulings on a motion to sever, evidentiary questions, or alleged prosecutorial misconduct; and 4)… [read post]
19 Jul 2008, 12:19 pm
Kilgore, 976 So. 2d 1066 (Fla. 2007) .......................................................................... 21 State ex rel. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 5:31 pm
See Ex parte Maple Chase Co., 840 So.2d 147, 150 (Ala. 2002) ("the federal courts are correct in holding that a party cannot impose on the producing party the cost of translating documents from a foreign language"); Rosado v. [read post]
30 May 2008, 3:32 pm
While Moore filed an Atkins claim in state court after that case came out, he filed it before the Court of Criminal Appeals issued Ex Parte Briseno in 2004, in which that court established the evidence a defendant must show to prove mental retardation. [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 7:13 am
Quarterman, No. 07-70004 Denial of an application for a certificate of appealability following denial of habeas relief is affirmed in part, but reversed in part where, in light of the recent decision in Snyder v. [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 1:11 am
 I should note this lawsuit is sometimes referred to, mostly by me, as Ex rel. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 7:36 am
[Defense objected with hearsay, which was overruled because the statement was part of a conspiracy]. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 9:47 am
Moore, No. 07-3434 Denial of an application for habeas corpus from a conviction and sentence for gross sexual imposition and rape is affirmed where petitioner's Fifth Amendment guarantee against double jeopardy was not violated because the requisite high degree of necessity existed for a mistrial. [read post]
4 Apr 2008, 1:00 am
: (creativecommons.org), Neil Netanel’s copyright paradox: (Patry Copyright Blog), Isn’t it ironic: TechCrunch blames the music industry for the dangerous ideas of Lessig and the free culture movement: (IPcentral.com) CFP: First interdisciplinary research workshop on free culture: (creativecommons.org), Of limitations, exceptions and verse (WIPO copyright committee): (KEI) Pharma & Biotech Pharma & Biotech - General StemCellPatents.com… [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 1:01 pm
Moore, No. 07-1365 In a defamation suit against Michael Moore for non-consensual use of an interview conducted for NBC Nightly News in Moore's "Fahrenheit 9/11" documentary film, dismissal of plaintiff's defamation claims is affirmed where plaintiff's appearance in the documentary was not reasonably susceptible of a defamatory meaning or interpretation under Massachusetts state law. [read post]