Search for: "Exhibit 2" Results 321 - 340 of 8,082
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Mar 2013, 10:31 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
The court immediately entered an order (attached as “Exhibit 2″) which found that “active efforts have been made to provide remedial services and rehabilitative programs” to the Pappans, and that taking the Pappan children away from their parents “is the least restrictive alternative available,” even though no evidence was introduced during the hearing on those issues. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 1:30 pm by Rick St. Hilaire
"The determinations made by the State Department under the federal immunity law are that the imported objects are of (1) of cultural significance, (2) intended for temporary, nonprofit exhibition, and (3) in the national interest.CONTACT: www.culturalheritagelawyer.com©2010-2012 Ricardo A. [read post]
4 Feb 2012, 8:09 am by Rick St. Hilaire
  The statute protects imported objects determined to be (1) of cultural significance, (2) intended for temporary, nonprofit exhibition, and (3) in the national interest.Museums importing objects for temporary display must apply for this legal protection. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 1:26 pm by Patrick S. O'Donnell
” Later I will post items found in exhibitions and catalogues and more directly related to my ongoing reading and research on White’s life and art (this is the second in the larger series on same, hence the parenthetical ‘2’ in the title). [read post]
10 Apr 2009, 3:00 pm
Tuesday, April 21, 2009THE SHERATON NEW YORKHOTEL & TOWERS811 SEVENTH AVENUENEW YORK CITYCONFERENCE AND CONSTRUCTION TECHNOLOGY EXHIBITION: 8:00 A.M. to 1:00 P.M.Individual Tickets: $250.Sponsorship Information AvailableCOUNCIL MEMBERS ARE ENTITLED TO (2) COMPLIMENTARY TICKETSAIA CONTINUING EDUCATION CREDITS WILL BE AVAILABLE           DOWNLOAD REGISTRATION FORMOR REGISTER ONLINE AT… [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 2:59 am
Poster 2: Artist: Alva Edwards, Louisiana Agricultural Extension Division, c.1917. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 8:12 am by Bob Milam
Option 2: Filter The first step when filtering attendees is to determine whether there are enough valuable leads attending the show to make it worth your while to exhibit. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 6:00 am by Robert Ambrogi
LegalTech takes place Jan. 31 to Feb. 2, 2011, at the New York Hilton. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 4:57 am by Walter Olson
“The card check proposal now has a good chance of being Exhibit A in the post-election Case against Democratic Overreach. [read post]
11 May 2011, 9:13 am by Howard Wasserman
Which, any of my students will tell you, is just wrong. 2) The defendants did not move to transfer venue, which is surprising. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 1:00 pm by davidferriero
” “My mom, along with her 3 siblings and her parents, fled Vietnam 2 days before the Fall of Saigon. [read post]
13 Mar 2018, 3:40 pm by klastufka
But the pigs in the exhibit were never let out for exercise. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 12:44 pm
(1) That you drew or exhibited a deadly weapon or firearm in the presence of another person, (2) That either you did so in a rude, angry, or threatening manner, or (3) You did so unlawfully in a fight or quarrel, and that you were not acting in self-defense or in the defense of another person at the time. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 6:32 am by Kaufman Dolowich
See full article at Read More […] The post Partner Christopher Brown Esq. quoted in: Be Prepared to Secure All Types of Evidence After Adverse Events, in Healthcare Risk Management, 11-2-2023 appeared first on Kaufman Dolowich. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 6:49 am by Kenan Farrell
Mortar Net continues its attempts to protect its “dovetail-shaped line of fibrous mesh products for use in masonry applications” (see example in Exhibit A below). [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 7:22 am by Allan Blutstein
Attorneys failed to sufficiently describe its search for records pertaining to plaintiff’s criminal case; (c) CIA conducted adequate search in response to plaintiff’s request for a court-filed exhibit, but failed to even respond to plaintiff’s second request; and (2) CIA properly withheld records pursuant to Exemption 3 in conjunction with National Security Act of 1974.Matthews v. [read post]