Search for: "FLOWERS v. FLOWERS" Results 321 - 340 of 1,177
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Aug 2015, 10:07 pm by Mark Summerfield
  And while ‘a rose by any other name would smell as sweet’, we would have some difficulty conducting a conversation about the fragrance of the rose if we were unable to agree on a common name to signify the flower in question. [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 10:18 am by Don Cruse
DENBURY GREEN PIPELINE-TEXAS, LLC, No. 09-0901 The Flower Mound Leader Star website has an update on TOWN OF FLOWER MOUND, TEXAS v. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 2:18 am by Matrix Law
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 07/04/23) East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Canada Square Operations Ltd v Potter, heard 14th June 2022 Unger and another (in substitution for Hasan) v Ul-Hasan (deceased) and another, heard 20th October 2022 Chief Constable of the Police Service of Northern Ireland and another v Agnew and others (Northern Ireland), heard… [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 8:35 am by Marcel Pemsel
This line of case law is supported by the recent General Court judgment in YAplus DBA Yoga Alliance v EUIPO (case T-443/21). [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 3:40 am by Edith Roberts
” At Religion News Service, Kristen Waggoner urges the court to review Arlene’s Flowers v. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 3:25 am
Robert then tackled Case C-323/09 Interflora Inc and Interflora British Unit v Marks & Spencer plc and Flowers Direct Online Limited, in which the CJEU viewed the impression of the average internet user as being an essential element of the test of whether the use of another's brand as a keyword conveys an impression that the use of that brand suggests that the user's business is connected with that of the brand owner. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 1:54 am by Edith Roberts
In an op-ed for The Daily Caller, Jake Warner urges the court to review Arlene’s Flowers v. [read post]