Search for: "FLOYD v. STATE"
Results 321 - 340
of 838
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Mar 2013, 1:27 pm
Earlier this month, Judge Scheindlin certified Ligon as a class action case and consolidated consideration of remedies in Ligon with the remedies in the broader class action suit against stop-and-frisk, Floyd v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 8:22 am
And would could be a more appropriate item to catch up on than the Catch-up case itself, ITV Broadcasting & others v TvCatchup. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 1:08 pm
This is especially important here in Florida because this is the fifth-highest state for uninsured motorists, with one out of ever four drivers lacking coverage, according to the Insurance Research Council. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 6:07 pm
The case is Ligon/Floyd v. [read post]
28 Sep 2016, 2:55 pm
" Floyd v. [read post]
31 Jul 2009, 3:59 am
The case is State v. [read post]
19 Sep 2022, 12:03 pm
The complaint contained stated the facts: George Floyd was murdered on May 25, 2020, prompting significant civil unrest. [read post]
14 May 2007, 1:05 am
Douglas Laycock, God v. [read post]
9 May 2017, 7:30 am
The “presumption of regularity” that attaches to all federal officials’ actions, United States v. [read post]
9 May 2017, 4:59 am
Yesterday afternoon, the Fourth Circuit, sitting en banc, heard two hours of argument in IRAP v. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 11:50 am
District Court for the Southern District of New York – to appear on her own behalf in order to seek reconsideration of the Second Circuit’s decision to reassign the case of Floyd v. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 3:03 pm
FLOYD MARLAND TYSON, Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 11:06 am
Floyd J had found that the patent as it stood was invalid. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 7:03 am
Analysing the five principles put forward by Floyd J in Ratiopharm v Napp Pharmaceutical Holdings Ltd [2008] EWHC 3070 (Pat) (see paras 154-159), Johnny observed that the days of simply pleading "obviousness over the CGK" are long gone - you must now assert what it is that you specifically allege is CGK. [read post]
2 Feb 2021, 8:47 am
v=Gy7QRZ4uMu0What is the ACLU’s position on policing? [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 7:38 am
In State v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:36 am
In the brand-new Court of Appeal decision just out - Actavis UK Ltd & Others v Eli Lilly & Company [2015] EWCA Civ 555 (25 June 2015), Lord Justice Floyd (Lords Justices Kitchin and Longmore concurring) disagreed with Arnold J on two main issues. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 3:59 pm
Vringo also cited the dicta of Mr Justice Floyd (as he then was) in IPCom v Nokia [2009] EWHC 1017 where, when asked to order a trial of a preliminary issue to determine the FRAND licence terms in relation to IPCom's patent in suit, he stated that: "...What is at stake between parties in portfolio patent litigation of this kind is usually the sum of money which will enable the grant of a worldwide licence under the entire portfolio. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 8:22 am
The Supreme Court has accepted a new case from California, Van de Kamp v. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 1:40 pm
Accordingly, we affirm the district court's grant of summary judgment against the State. 08a0105p.06 Floyd v. [read post]
