Search for: "FORD v. UNITED STATES"
Results 321 - 340
of 1,107
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Mar 2018, 4:31 am
The first is United States v. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 3:52 pm
” United States v. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 10:17 am
In United States v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 2:00 am
District Court in Synar v. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 4:18 am
At Capital Appellate Advocacy, Lawrence Ebner maintains that “[t]he real Supreme Court Bar is not limited to the small number of very talented attorneys who repeatedly handle oral arguments before the Court,” but “is composed of hundreds of attorneys from around the United States who author and file Supreme Court petitions and briefs. [read post]
8 Mar 2007, 12:13 pm
State v. [read post]
26 May 2009, 3:57 am
United States Postal Service, 988 F. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 1:19 pm
On August 22, 2008, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania entered judgment against Carpenter, finding it liable for 80% of the costs paid by the plaintiffs as of December 31, 2007, plus prejudgment interest. [read post]
4 Aug 2016, 12:25 pm
Halcon is an independent oil and natural gas exploration and production company engaged in the acquisition, production, exploration, and development of onshore liquids-rich oil and natural gas reserves in the United States, primarily in the Bakken and Three Forks formations in North Dakota, and the Eagle Ford formation in East Texas. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 5:44 pm
It was also distinguishable from the use of private property for the purposes of collecting signatures for a petition (Appleby v United Kingdom, no. 44306/98, 6 May 2003) or the general prohibition on a ship entering the State’s territorial waters for campaigning purposes (Women on Waves v Portugal, no. 31276/05, 3 February 2009). [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 1:43 pm
” Ford Motor Co. v. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 7:53 am
The Texas Supreme Court denied the landowners’ motion for rehearing last Friday in Murphy v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 9:37 am
In relevant part, § 1442(a)(1) provides that `[a] civil action . . . that is commenced in a State court’ may be removed to federal court if the action is against `any officer (or any person acting under that officer) of the United States . . . for or relating to any act under color of such office. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 9:24 am
In his majority decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 8:48 am
At the heart of their suit is whether they are "lawfully present" in the United States. [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 1:54 am
United States, 2007 U.S. [read post]
11 May 2017, 10:40 pm
"The Court takes no position on whether a prosecution is or is not warranted, a decision entirely up to the United States Attorney," Alsup wrote. [read post]
16 Aug 2019, 4:13 am
Hawaii Wildlife Fund, a Clean Water Act case the justices will hear next term in which the “citizen suit plaintiffs [argue] that discharges that travel through groundwater and eventually end up in a water of the United States fall within the CWA’s jurisdiction. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 12:22 pm
The case is United States v. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 9:00 am
FORD MOTOR COMPANY, ET AL. v. [read post]
