Search for: "FRANCE v. STATE"
Results 321 - 340
of 3,127
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Dec 2017, 2:54 am
France and Hachette Filipacchi Associés v. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 4:23 pm
In Savva Terentyev v. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 5:49 am
We only have to think 'Garcia v Google' in support of this conclusion (see here and here).What about France? [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 5:15 am
State, supra.Clay v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 7:23 am
International Justice, Wild West v. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 8:48 am
FRANCES ANN BRANCA, App. [read post]
9 Apr 2016, 4:28 pm
France, Stoll v. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 6:14 pm
She stated that the prosecutor was not required to file in person his appeal. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 6:14 pm
She stated that the prosecutor was not required to file in person his appeal. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 9:29 am
On October 11th 2011, the 4th section of the ECHR stated that masked police officers “should be required to visibly display some anonymous means of identification – for example a number or letter” (Hristovi v. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 2:51 pm
The following contribution to our Shelby County v. [read post]
14 Nov 2015, 10:23 am
Second, if NATO invokes Article V of the North Atlantic Treaty, it would trigger an international law obligation on the United States to “assist” France by taking “such action as [the United States] deems necessary, including the use of armed force, to restore and maintain the security of the North Atlantic area. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 2:54 am
Various parties ("the Opponents") who were also involved in rubber flooring products opposed this request on the basis that it had already registered the word DALSOUPLE as a UK and Community trade marks for the same classes and goods.In these proceedings Dalsouple France sought a declaration of invalidity in relation to the Opponents' UK trade mark, relying on section 3(6) of the 1994 which governs bad faith: said Dalsouple France, the Opponent must have applied to… [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 5:07 pm
The legal balancing exercise that has to be carried out when dealing with situations involving political discussions between politicians, civil servants and private individuals is therefore quite complex: All individuals making statements about political matters are entitled to ‘enhanced’ protection expression; However, elected politicians are expected to have thicker skins and are subject to “wider limits of acceptable criticism” (see, for example, Janowski v Poland… [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 8:34 pm
Best Value Kosher Foods, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 7:07 am
Although some inmates have claimed that the procedure in their states differs in some ways from the Kentucky procedure upheld by the Court in Baze v. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 4:05 am
United States, 2014 U.S. [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 8:06 pm
”The case cite is Commission v. [read post]
30 Jul 2006, 8:56 am
France at paragraph 30, and Case C-177/04 Commission v. [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 1:44 am
In Tim Knight v AXA Assurance [2009] EWHC 1900 (QB) the court was asked to determine two preliminary issues of law: whether the assessment of damages, where liability is admitted, should be governed by English law; and to what extent the award of pre-judgment interest should be governed by English law and/or French law.Mr Knight who lived in England, was knocked down while holidaying in France by a car, registered in France, and driven by a French national, domiciled in… [read post]
