Search for: "Fast v. Fast"
Results 321 - 340
of 6,803
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jun 2023, 2:02 pm
Term Limits v. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 12:10 pm
(Compare Robinson v. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 5:01 am
Mar. 31, 1997), or that the film The Fast and the Furious led a viewer to race and crash his car, see Widdoss v. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 10:43 pm
The UK Competition Appeal Tribunal (CATribunal, or just CAT) is moving amazingly fast. [read post]
11 Jun 2023, 7:19 am
Co. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 9:07 am
[6] Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), sometimes also referred to as genetic fingerprinting, is used to compare E. coliO157:H7 isolates to determine if the strains are distinguishable. [3, 7] A technique called multilocus variable number of tandem repeats analysis (MLVA) is used to determine precise classification when it is difficult to differentiate between isolates with indistinguishable or very similar PFGE patterns. [8] E. coli O157:H7… [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 11:31 am
This is a win for employers who may now have some recourse to protect and recover the value of property destroyed during labor disputes (Glacier Northwest, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 10:22 am
[Alice Corp. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 9:43 am
Read, Simon, Leslie V., Richard A. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 9:07 am
See Mata v. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 1:56 pm
How fast do you need to be driving to get fined 121,000 euros ($129,544)? [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 9:01 am
Not so fast. [read post]
3 Jun 2023, 12:26 pm
—Mario Andretti 1Positano Place at Naples Condominium Assoc. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 10:51 am
This decision in Cadena v. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 7:04 am
The DPC observed that parties “falling within the definition of an electronic communications service provider [“ECS”] subject to the FISA 702 PRISM programme may equally fall foul of the requirements of Chapter V GDPR and the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights regarding their transfers of personal data to the USA” (paragraph 10.11). [read post]
31 May 2023, 9:55 am
Fast action is recommended. [read post]
30 May 2023, 9:18 pm
In my previous post I already said that this case--the biggest and highest-profile one in the history of the UK and one of the most important antitrust cases the world has ever seen--could further delay the Optis Wireless v. [read post]
29 May 2023, 9:01 pm
As Justice Alito’s 2017 majority opinion in Matal v. [read post]
27 May 2023, 11:05 am
” People v. [read post]
26 May 2023, 4:11 pm
As we discuss in detail in this post, the state Supreme Court set a high standard for vicarious liability in the 2015 case of Gonzalez v. [read post]
